Thaci and the War

No one in Kosovo has seen war before the current president. The circumstances of war try to homogenize society, so they make it a bit dynamic within the warring group where the need to stay would have to be understood. Showing ambition at the time of self - sacrifice and idealism is an act of betrayal. Looks like it. This is within the group's economy of power that the external risk cause does not tolerate divisions. Therefore, requirements for the representation level are small, as are requirements for individual representative values. The struggle for power between individuals and subgroups is unintelligible, and for that very reason it causes random people, with no value or quality, to surface. One of them was Thaci.

Amid an environment composed of Azem Syla, Jakup Krasniqi and similar, amid an environment overwhelmed by idealism which did not even want to see and let it better understand individual ambition é Thaci became political director of the KLA. Later, the chairman of the largest party to leave the war. And after a decade, when what happened after Rugova's death, he became prime minister and later president.

I don't believe Thaci's political action is behind any of his skills. I believe he's a functional illiterate who, among many other functional illiterates, managed to slip into what he didn't get conceived. One might say, "How is it possible to become prime minister and later president, being completely incompetent? Well, I believe that. Take Rugova's example [I'm not saying he was disabled]. He did not say anything to manage the power he had as his president, but managed to win elections in a convincing way against Thaci's party. Constantly. In Kosovo, the case has a very important post in the political scheme. Shooting someone's relative, shooting someone, being in a certain place is very important.

In the last decade, a poor habit developed on daily policy analyses: anything that happens and doesn't happen is attributed to local leaders. Every political event moves around. This, in fact, makes the position of analysts and opinionists themselves important. If day-to-day events didn't have actors, then the analysis wouldn't do for television, consumption.

Thus, any political decision these politicians made, however futile and insignificant, was linked to some setback. In fact, this way of thinking has taken root and it's lush in every television studio, every newspaper space, every public/political space. Wessel's Thaci was attributed to blame for Vetevendosje's division, the LDK split, the weakening of smaller parties, and everything else. And how much inconsistent was this record, we saw it at Albin Kurti, who on one hand accused of the bad things he had done to the country, and on the other, Thaci called him an ignorant man who didn't even write the most basic words.

Thaci is not as good as he or she is supposed to be. If there's anything wrong with him, it's inconsistent in thinking, ignorance. I don't want to link this attitude to the ethical rationality of Socrates, who said that what he didn't know couldn't be good. In fact, I just want to look into the way this kind of skill is conceived. I think there's just been a strange idea that evil is linked to a certain type of knowledge/lordship. With a wise trail to the rear, in the dark, where nothing is seen. That's because the very pursuit of individual power has shifted into darkness, being unbearable in light. So if you're evil, you should be smart. So we are still within the ethical diskes of good and evil that originate with man, like a rigid electronic entity that is just what it is. The normalizing of ambition, the struggle of individuals for social and political positioning, would cause people to develop and then discover their skills. This area that leaves no room for ambition, which develops the instinct of equals, causes the representation level to be filled with fools, type of Thaci, type of student organizations, different nongovernmental, and similar organizations that benefit just by hiding their skills in the dark where there is ambition.

Thaci's recent actions respond to his habit, which neither diminish nor enhance his popularity. He had said a few years ago that he never had “handgun”, while today he said Serbia's threats, Kosovo would respond “with rifle”. He has made his party distasteful, has made war contemptible, has despised every word he says, so that those who deal with daily politics try to invent a setback to understand it better. That's because it hurts them to know they're dealing with a fool. Realizing that this society has put exactly fools at the top of political power.

Something else needs to be added: Our society, still resistant to education, has cultivated a kind of deep sympathy for fools. It may publicly swear, but in private environments it pleases those who do not know how to write, read, and think. With their ignorance they make genuine cooking. And when one of them gets involved in some greedy work, in a greedy social position, then according to their closeness, they look with sympathy and kindness. Our company is still stupid-loved. Perhaps it is because foolishness itself is a bit of a place of comfort. This is evident in cynicism over any idealism and cause. Over any kind of culture. In the great need to be emptied of all kinds of faith and to get involved in any kind of recreation.