Silence language

At Croton School, the renowned philosopher Pythagora Institutiond the discipline of silence two thousand-five-five-tenths-cussed years ago. His best students were subjected to silence, so they were not to talk for five years. The organ language was viewed as uncontrollable. She used to speak words based on feeling, often self - sacrificing, which seriously damaged thinking and made man captive to his words.

I think it's necessary to cultivate silence as a civic passion in our country. We talk too much. And yet we do not do anything of it.

People talk nonsense. They slander, prejudge, they build conspiracy theories, they don't even get tired of doing anything for logic. They don't even get tired of thinking. As Nicja said, the “Opinion that comes to mind when we're asked about one thing is usually not ours, but it's just that of our register, position, origin; our personal opinions rarely surface.” So people get that existing logic, that existing prejudice, and they communicate it. They become their agents. The important thing is to penetrate the other person through what you say, to interfere with your soul, your thinking, and the dead.

Speaking is a social event, as Wetgenstein referred to, indicating the inability of private language. Speaking is an ongoing activity that communicates with values. Every word is within a predimatic terrain. Within a controlled language terrain. Every word said is thus a weapon for positioning in the production scheme, or weapons for defense of position [we need to think more extensively of this concept than of institutional position].

The inability to control the tongue makes man completely false, inautetic. Vulture of various powers that penetrate his soul. Whether to say “Today is a good day” just to start a weed with someone, it's a big betrayal of yourself. It means committing a betrayal of the meaning and feelings that are in you. To betray the values and beliefs that you willingly chose.

To condemn communication with '%opinione kaste, position, orgy” means to be unable to defeat personal opinions even that rare show.

Because silence is viewed as unacceptable, words have lost their importance. Speaking simply and only means being unmovable. To believe in something also means to be in a position after a certain social status, in the light of a better position within a system that suppresses people's potential.

The circumstances we are in can be described with the following cliche: we speak but say nothing. We utter words that we do not know, nor do we think, nor do they matter to us. And so, even in our daily lives, we sell ourselves, through what we say, to this system of decade worth. Not that we don't know what others say, but we don't even know what we say. This lack of silence, this deafening lack of silence, undoubtedly suggests that we do not know how to hear or see. Everything gets into one ear and out of the other. That doesn't make us understand each other, don't have empathy for each other, fail to process any sense inside of us, get to ride a loving and curious spirit that makes a reader read, and most recently, fail to understand even the cultural-Social circumstance we're in.

Two or three years ago, I decided to stop talking. To be mute. A very radical self-discipline measure and naively promised failure. And that failed to break a certain relationship. Understandably, people these days, Facebook people, can't understand the silence. They can't even understand radicality.

Yet, it is clearer to me than ever that we should exercise and understand silence, be patient to listen to and understand what we are talking about, have patience to read and understand what we read. Otherwise we're stuck in the absurd amount of amorphacy.

Kosovo's ordinary young man does not read even ten books a year, but still through empty words he says on the street, cafes, Facebook, houses, he writes ten books for a week. And of course, we're more, much more influenced by these everyday, unconnected books than by the important books that reveal important ideas.

A year ago I was in favor of changing the code and the criminal procedure where slander was criminalized. This is a seemingly authoritarian measure, but that actually, simply, and only makes the word important. Important public engagement. The criticism of power has become inconsistent and inconsistent, often unarted, conspiring, biased and dense. We must take responsibility for what we say. About the attitudes we take. For the choices we make. This can be done only by putting silence in our legal strategy. Accept a new language, with silence as vital parts of it. To invent a language of silence.