Power and Football

Epistemic or predimatic change in Western Europe during the end of the 20th century V III caused power to be economyd [rehumanized, according to the naive interpretation of the Illuminati.] From this economy, that is, a narrow estimate of power strategies for the production of results, drastic changes were made. German philosopher Martin Heidegger, yet the apps of the Internet as “Google Map”, it said the ground was a technical floor. This type of thinking may be extended further because the sky today is technographed or X - rayed and may be called a technicalʹtavan. So this kind of economy of power by means of a basic reconstruction of human life, and man himself, it brought in today, to a meal where technology makes the name, and where human slavery is done through unscathed chains, and they feel no pain, and they don't even look.

In the mid - 20th century, we had the birth of various cultural forms for the filling of leisure. The economy of power was so comprehensive that it was extended to seemingly free spaces of people: therefore, leisure time was also economyd [theology of sports is free time]. It's settled. In this writing, I will particularly deal with football, as one of these cultural forms, although I do not follow it at one time.

The core of sports football is identity. This sport was created by factory workers in various English industrial cities, and the competition was a race between towns and towns. The closer the location of the rival club was, the greater the rivalry. It was in England that football preserved its local character, described by some of the most pronounced decentralisation of industrialization, even during the 1970 ' s and 1980 ' s, at a time when the spirit of commercialization in Italy and Spain felt. Most of the clubs we see as big today are created at the end of the 20th or early 20th century. But their popularity increased only in the 1970 ' s and ' 80 ' s, when this game's local identity was being overcome for the better. At that meal England, although born of modern football, was away from Spain and particularly Italy. In Italy and Spain, there were more players, more money, more non-local viewers, and more international successes. Local character was long suspended in England, naturally the cause of the industrialization course, but causing major commercialisation problems. Even large - city teams failed to remain at the top of the table. The race was very widespread, and it was everywhere, and it marred the possibility of non-local fans being attracted, as connection with a club led to much despair. Consistence is very important for a football fan to remain a player for a certain club. The results of those we now know as large teams in England and the decades in question testify to that.

But that changed. Former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, taking advantage of the tragedy at Hastel Stadium, accusing Liverpool fans [who after two decades proved no fault], decided to fight hooliganism where she got the greatest vitality of local identity and to make football more inclusive, and thus more widely distributed. The 1990s disciplined fans, normalized them, and thus elite football in England became an increasingly popular form of culture. For children, women, elders, Asians, Africans, South Americans, and anyone who had a TV or had money to pay the ticket. For anyone caught in the net of this sport, and now connected to the non-local identity of football clubs.

But the local spirit is still present. I witnessed a scene, in a Pristina bar, where a fan from Manchester who lived in Pristina, as his team was losing out from Seville, confronted my Kosovo friend who supported and enjoyed the success of the Spanish team. He said: Whatever you're enjoying, you're not from Seville”

The 1980 ' s produced Liverpool as a great team. From that time on, this club did not fall as low as it had fallen in the 1970 ' s, 60 ' s, and 50 ' s. Although he never won the title in about 30 years, he has preserved his élitarism, constantly being among the major teams on the board. The 1990 ' s produced Manchester United and Arsenal. Then, in the 2000 ' s, England had already penetrated international markets and only deepened its presence. Today, you find many fans of English clubs in Kosovo as well. I was among them.

This is our soccer game. Already, football has been stolen from the towns where clubs lie, and it's scattered everywhere like a new form of colonialism. Too much local character has been stolen or faded. False images are produced, empty identities, and are generated before endors.

Let's get the best football debate in the world. Football is a collective sport, yet it makes a product of reduced images, in individual prominence, in order to strengthen people's connections with it. A few days ago he resigned after 22 years in office, Arsene Wenger coach of Arsenal. The owner of the club said that the club's identity was related to his picture and that he had bought the club, which was inspired by Wenger. Here's a severe reduction in the identity of a club. But return the debate on Ronald and Mess. The two players were fabricated by the need for such a debate. It's a personal anthem. For the image of a man. The two players served from their clubs in extreme need of humanization. “More than a” club It's Barcelona's motto. This shows the complex and inadequacy of football clubs to be just football clubs. And football to be simple and just football, a sport, a certain way to pass leisure.

Crossing local identity and disinclined football in the fate of another means of conquest and slavery. Another form of addiction for many. It became another mechanism that produced unnecessary needs that produced absurd and reduced images to reap economic enzymes.

Many people in Kosovo watch football. But most of them only watch international football, not local football. That's why our football can't improve and can't improve enough to turn all the mass of fans in the country. Football belongs to someone else. We are destined for the fate of the spectators.