Why are VVA's unhappy ones not creating a new party?

From the outbreak of the war how virtual and how verbal within the VV, to the first 2-3 nights debate between Konjufca and Moliqaj, the main question that is turning into the heads of the average Kosovar averages is why the unhappy are not starting subject to their eventual being separated by the party stub. Perhaps the haste of all the developments that appear there influenced you before the question: ési? In fact, this question epitomized the entire peaceful public opinion that we have: the pens that were sold as information and as public communication, hardly expected to know when the division will occur (the source of drilling is talking to each other, not to each other, just as it happened in famous communication stemming from the viberus). But what was seen only a short time later, not only by acting actors who fanned the divide, but also by all of us was the fact that predestination of the time of separation from a subject like VV is not a bit of a dilemma.

In fact, for each other political subject in this country, functionality comes before ontology. The party is seen as neither less nor more than a group of interest clarified by collective idealism and revolutionary presumptions. And under such policymaking conditions is the easiest possible thing: since functionality only requires a lot of political and public vision in the country, it's not a matter of having their entire political career built on ésiê, rather than on pse. These are guys like Ilir Deda for example. The only technology of this political figure can be considered ontology of negration: it does not go with the arm of war (excluding time of councilality at the time of Bajram Rexhepi). Next, wherever he can. Why not even at the LDK press conference, just like he did nothing further than yesterday. Likewise, Obadiah is said to be the one who has been more economical in the number of his crossings.

But the cracks created within the VV are proving to be of another nature compared to the court of functionality, so not to say it does not belong to that yard at all. This is because even the most opportun/progmatic member of that subject for his time in the world has not been able to save the same ontological fence as the member remembers) P Although it's there. This has resulted from the same spiritual investment, notoriety and masoks that have characterised the Movement, especially after the two victims of February 10, 2007. The memorial chamber why you are part of the Movement has always overweighted the strategy: how to function the Movement, respectively, how the Movement itself works.

And now it looks like right here sleeps the confusion of the unhappy already faced with the Oriental vacuum. Because spiritual investment for years, a member of such a delinquency in such a time beam in action/activism, does not allow butterfly crossings or lipagas divorce. In other words, as Aida Drdguti & Co, the last two years for many began to resemble the social and political types that have accepted the rules of the game (the movement of American/international interventionism, vulgar capitalism, media connections given to certain media), behind the fact that the common past is being remedied by differences, differences and interscalities of the last 1-2 years.

The VV was born to prevent further devariation of Albanian nationalism and maytism, at a time when through ethnic decentralisation it was moving towards partition (at least strengthening ideas on partition), respectively, through the privatisation of vulgar capitalism (most caught by the side of the war) to the atonement of any kind of socioeconomic thought with a human face. It is quite understandable that as long as it has been an entrepreneur, it has to be applauded -- it can't even imagine the opposition in this country without the VV) has created a kind of learned and spiritual schizophrenic of the subject himself from before the crack, if not from the beginning. Are we retarded? Should we accept or reject the system? Is there hope in our cause and so on? If we get even further into the ether, explanations on the reluctance of the dissatisfied come out even deeper: how much the nationalist and leftist profiles in a Balkans that across the political courses of the deploying centres are described as a parallel expected to be attached to Europe. A plant that goes after a capitalist mother? How much more can you be followed if you claim that you have left nationalism and maytism overnight? And all of this in the society that neither society is, since the first thing you can expect from it is the flight to idealistic and collective calls.

Frustrated about the slow movement of the ship in the middle of the sea, they are forgetting that they may not know how to swim. Just as they are forgetting that even if they swim across the ocean, there will be no support around them, since the ship's crew is thought to be doing so on their own, will they? This is because the question of why, at one point, has preceded the question as well as when.