Shpend Ahmeti's advisor doesn't pass the driver's test Aquazon for bribery

Kastrat on a Facebook note said he was used to hearing that the driving test can't be passed without giving some money, but he shared this experience with everyone after he became part of it.

He relates his entire experience, claiming that he fell just because he did not bribe.

Kastrati's complete scripture:

I'm sharing with you a very sad and disappointing experience that I had today on the practical driver's license test.

After enough achievements in the theoretical test, today I had the actual test. Over the last few days, in preparation for this test, in discussions with different people I realized there is a general culture of understanding how you can do <x0kry” this test. Almost all the people who have been challenged in this process, they've already told me the same thing: <x2Kryjee before, because most people are particularly going to tear you down the first time even if you don't make mistakes to”

Honestly, I didn't take that into account.

Unfortunately, that's what I proved today, since I tried myself.

I'm starting to explain the story by showing that my term for testing was at 09 a.m. Three other people we were together had it at 09:30, 10:00 from now on. Before we started testing for the four of us, by one person (relatively close) I was informed of what my assessment (examiner) will be and that “if we wanted to, we can safely pass it if we give it money, we corrupt it”. He definitely told me without saving himself, without a scroll. Normally my answer was: “has no chance”. I'm not going to mention the person's name in question, believing he's not involved at all, but he knows exactly how the organization works.

At 12:09 a.m. practice test, I joined the Eczaminer's report, even though he was discussing going to lunch at the time and was sure to be back in an hour or two. However, “sacrificed” lunch time for what I'm so over “Offset” Despite this, pending, all three of these people who were with me went before me to test, even though each one of them was later than I was in time. Fortunately, or unfortunately all three of them passed this practical test. Although I didn't know them at all personally, with two of them, I didn't want to argue, and I don't want to judge whether they had “made it before”, I hope not. But with the third one, since we left the last two for testing, and we had more time for discussions, I knew for sure that he had bribed, he had committed the “Fugitive”.

So I got lucky, it was finally 12:09 p.m., and I started the test practice.

I know that in our culture, self - justification or blaming others for any challenge we cannot overcome. I am also aware that during all my exercise with my school instructor, I made many mistakes out of carelessness, and that was my main concern.

But I and the school instructor were also convinced that I was very careful at the test with very few mistakes, definitely as tolerant as they are.

Before the trial began, I realized that there are at most seven slight mistakes to be tolerated. No serious mistakes are tolerated or repeated for three times while testing the same error. However, I was much more careful than doing 7 light mistakes, much less repetition for three times the same mistake or some serious error.

Despite my drive, of course, why I haven't bribed, Eczaminer, the Islamic Union, wrote me 8 light mistakes, minimally not to pass this test (just one more mistake than not to pass). I'm aware that I made two mistakes while driving and could admit two more suspicious ones. Although it certainly was not my fault for them, I would still be in order for such an assessment.

The mistakes that Mr. The Islamic Union is as follows:

1. 1 Flagged error

2. 1 error

3. 1 mistake in running, stopping, parking.

4. 2 Errors

5. 2 wrongs, turning left, right

6. 1 error

A preliminary processing error, a background error, a back-and-side look, a dead angle, 2 error é observation, care (to other participants) and 2 mistakes way, turning left, right being made up even though the “construed” and to prove this will do Anke at the Ministry of Infrastructure where the driver's license department is. Fortunately, while testing the Eczaminers are obliged to put on camera footage throughout the trial. Even though I don't expect the applicant (Infrastructural Ministry) to make any correct considerations for the test assessment (Examiner) will still follow this process to the end.

The account of my experience has nothing to do with reasoning or to prove an unrighteous person who I am convinced was done to me. On the contrary, I explained my account to show that they are a large part of people who are forced to pay money to carry a driver's license, whether they know enough in driving or not.

In the end, the most important thing in all these phenomena would be to investigate this department (and many others). Not only to remove corrupt people from institutions but, more important, not to become the value rate in society and the only opportunity to do any work.

Since expectations to the institutions of justice are very small as society, for this sphere and all other spheres, we have a duty to report for any relative, and yet here a great contribution can play various investigative media.