Half of Albin Kurti's speech

Half of Albin Kurt's speech to protest was good, the other half was bad. Since many people have described this speech as extraordinary, I will write about its ugly part. While Albin was speaking of the protest as a state event rather than someone's hate, [...]
Here's one of the garbage from this speech:
It looks like the president is trying to keep two pumpkins under his armpit and that means he's even carrying a third pumpkin over his neck!” This sentence is not worthy of an opposition leader who claims to take power and potentially sit in the same chair that Mr. Thaci is sitting in. This not only expresses hatred, but also the lack of basic culture and ethics of human communication where the other is carelessly offended for lack of intellect, or, as it is said, the pumpkin presence instead of the head-body!
Contract Albin Kurti, inspiring how the president represents the political minority, said that “ai is with a leg standing on a leg holding the prime minister on one leg... “This whole thing looks like an old folk song: “Four has goats, three legs of ball, two flowers have girls...” and other blah... A game of words that lost the understanding and logical effect on their repetition and that had not even a rhetorical effect. Saying shame!
What was noted was that Albin Kurti manipulated with incorrect information about the activities and meetings of President Thaci, trying to disassemble him morally and politically, even declaring him a traitor, an accomplice of Serbia and Russia without relevant evidence. It was seen as having no clear idea of the exchange plan and mentioned dots, villages and cities as certain that the agreement with Serbia was being signed yesterday.
His slogans about Kosovo's territorial integrity had clear meaning, but the slogan for the territorial integrity of the Valley, its unconsciousness allowed itself to understand that he either did not know what he wanted to do with Presevo, Medvegen and Bujanovac or he was knowingly giving Serbia.
Then he called for popular uprisings when he said the “government is growing and the state is shrinking, so the people are rising and joining”! Comparing the open wallet of the poor man with the open onions and tears as a result of opening both times, sounded like a rare find, but not really motivated, because not every open onions causes tears and wallet doesn't cause tears, since man knows the state of his wallet and when he makes money in it doesn't even open it! He may cause the voice of a child seeking bread but not wallets.
The execution of the collapse of the pillars of government was exaggerated: “we have schools and we don't have schooling, we have hospitals and we don't have recovery“. Very unclear was his plan to replace Serbian products with those of the local market and Albania, and that his criticism was also oriented towards the Albanian government!
It was finally clear that his speech was a clock bomb planted against President Thaci against the government and an open call for civil revolt. His voice was acting, loud, and threatening on behalf of the protest and protesters, especially when it combined with the rhythm of tupas imitating the start of a physical confrontation with the other group and was definitely not a voice for joining positions and ideas about the country.
It can easily be found that Albin in the square was for his votes and not for anything else.










