Reprehensives in Visar Ymer's Resignative Speech

Today, the acting chairman of Vetevendosje, Visar Ymer, resigned. In a brief but meaningful speech, he expressed dissatisfaction with recent developments on the political subject that led him. But there were contradictions in his speech.

He has again not hesitated to say that the “ides should be above the individual”, thus attacking party founder Albin Kurtin. Visar Ymer has further attacked an anonymous group of people who, by being called in the name of Albin [The Kurt], have launched a lynching and slandering campaign against some other people, also anonymously. Ymer said that problems would have to be solved in the bodies of the Movement, not through a method he calls informal.

But stop at this point.

The outgoing VV chairman said there were three pillars at the core of the subject's political organisation leading: 1) loyalty to the political concept; 2) mutual trust among activists; 3) self- denial. Such a key is quite problematic because it portrays a way of extremely personal functioning, information in itself by creating vast spaces for misuse. See second story: mutual trust among activists. How can a sense of political organization be a pillar? It's probably his insaneness, since he only attacked the informality of the method in a matter of seconds, forgetting that even these pillars that protected them were also based on the character of different people, and informality.

But another contradiction can reveal much in later words. At first he attacked those people who made a self-contained <x0-juddy, insinuations, labels”. But a few lines down, he says a method and such a “campaign is unnecessary because the Movement has its own organs and disciplinary organs that have the potential and the will to protect each of the activists from integrity violations, and to protect the organization from those who want to harm it. ”

If the movement could protect you through available devices, why did it reach this point? Here, though, is something else.

Careful readers can see from the above lines that Ymeri is implying that the people who were called into Albin's name, who are slandering and insinuate, were actually protecting someone through that method. So Vicar Ymer himself with his own mouth clearly implied that the objective of attacking these people was what they used to be. They had attacked. In the end, the disciplinary organs within the Movement could do so. So the problem turns out to be deeper. The lynching campaign, it turns out to be earlier. And the initial target of these attacks, it seems, was not “Aidea Drdguti and Dardan Moliqaj” but the members of the other group, not deputy Albin Kurti himself.

While in the early part of his talk, Ymer expresses another claim that may be a flashback in the dark crisis that Vetevendosje is going through. He said “naturally that people engaged also make mistakes”, adding that mistakes should be addressed but not questioned about motives. Thus, we very much learn that someone in Vetevendosje has made a serious mistake, which was most likely a slander, or lynching to party founder Albin Kurti.

But can the question also be asked? What would happen if those people who attack Visar Ymeri didn't use their informal method? Who would suffer the mistake that Ymer says should be treated and his motives not traced? And on the other hand, who would be strengthened? Would Vetevendosje's disciplinary organs have an opportunity to maintain the integrity of activists? Hardly reliable if we consider what came to light last month. And it is hard to believe that lynching is confined only to part of this political subject, since the second pillar of the core of political organisation is said to be mutual confidence. Homo homini lupus est said Hobbits, which is translated into Albanian by “Man for man is wolf” The belief that the idea must be above the éndidivivid, or ébabe, is based on this postulate. If people were good and reliable, why would they have to submit to the idea?

And when it comes to the third pillar of political organization, self - denial, we need to close our ears quite firmly. Salaries, functions, fame spread, as in other political parties, and it is understandable that these basically make a clean self - sacrificing commitment.