Regon Shpend Ahmeti after Dardan Moliqaj interview

Pristina Mayor Shpend Ahmeti has broken the silence after Dardan Moliqaj's words in a show saying Albin Kurti has accused Ahmeti of having agreements with embassies to bring him down.

Pristina's chairman has provided a clarification on these charges, saying there has never been an ambition to be at the helm of the Vetevendosje Movement, and these ambitions will not have in the future.

Also, Shpend Ahmeti has said he is mild by nature and does not know what to do to be strong.

Ahmeti's full delivery:

Last night in Rubik, Dardan Moliq told two things about me

1. “Albin has told him and all the others over and over again since 2011 and recently in 2016 (as I learned last night) that I have written agreements with embassies to bring Albin” refrain from me

2. In 2015 there was a long discussion between Albin, Dardan, Visar, and others to make Visari chairman after Albin's withdrawal, but there was a fear that I could run, which I thought would be a bad thing because I was the mild “ ”.

For the first one, I mean, I don't know if Albini said this or not, but I already heard it from different people these days. No one in this period has ever told me or expressed this grief. If Albin, Dardan, and others have thought so, then it is painful. I have contributed to the realisation of the movement's programming and statuteic concepts. And for the embassies of “the agreements” are not worth saying.

I am a follower of sincere discussions and mutual trust on a political subject. That's why I don't understand the discussion of the fear of my running for Movement Speaker in 2015. No one has discussed this with me that year directly either. If someone asked me in 2015, I'd tell him in two minutes that I had no ambition or desire to be head of LVV. I have repeated this several times at the Movement Forums throughout this period. I say it again today; I have no interest, ambition, nor desire to run for LVV chairman. Neither in 2015 nor in 2018 nor later.

Maybe I'm also a soft “ ” even though I don't know exactly what you're supposed to be doing when you're “strong” is in front of this classification, but I'm behind this “If that's not enough, it's okay, because even discussions about who should be leading and who character should be normal on a political subject. My loving “positions have been expressed openly at all the forums of Movement, and in public I have presented and represented the positions of the Movement regardless of whether I agreed to them or not. I don't regret either.