How do I know the motto “Astria Justice! ”

Shut up, Dehar.
That freedom has this prize
I'm sorry.
They told me they killed themselves.  

Shut up, Dehar.
Wash your breath well
# Living with my breath #
Freedom knows only that way

Shut up, Dehar.
Your death prevents
State Has Other Priorities
A big prison is building  

Shut up, Dehar.
That this power and life steal
Our answer makes sense
Rest quietly for us alive

(verses written by a friend of mine unpublished)

The death of citizen and political activist Astrit Dehar, banned by the state in anticipation of judgment for serious acts against the state, tells of a situation where power does not allow the political activism of citizens who challenge the status quoa, and, furthermore, does neither life nor the status of biological man of those who arrest them. His life as a political activist is punished, but neither does his biological life as a living matter, but is left at the mercy of public judgment and suicide if we accept the official explanation of his death. The situation to strike fear of this oppressive and deadly system! So, you shouldn't stop seeking justice for Astri. Otherwise, sooner or later, the astreta jena all of us. But what does it mean to seek justice for Astri?

Prolog

November 7, 2016. 7:30 p.m. Kosovo Radio Television. Central news. A day before the US presidential election: over 15 minutes “warned of personal names, roads, squares, Kosovo's butts of Pristina with Clinton names; “anquet” with citizens who will win the presidential election there, and a guest in the studio who is still talking about squares, streets with Clinton names! All of this, ironically, just on the day the first results of citizen autopsy and political activist Astrit Deharit, found dead under mysterious circumstances two days ago in a prison cell in Prizren where he was being held as suspected of terrorist acts against the state. The result of his body autopsy comes in third from the second half of the central edition. News of the so-called public media service, RTK.

Homo sacer

“Homo sacer”, a category on the Law of ancient Rome, brought to the attention by philosopher Giorgio Agamben, appointed the man whom the state expelled from the community by removing all civic rights, deprived of legal protection, and banned any relationship with him as a result of his involvement in certain violations of the law. Such ones were not executed, so their legitimate killing was prohibited, nor was their killing punished by those who killed him, for it was not considered a crime, nor was it initiated in religious rituals, nor was it an offering to the gods.

It has been more than a year since Astrit Dehar left this life and some more since he was treated as “homo sacer” by the state and society. The Astritus was excluded from a way of being a citizen, being deprived of active political citizenship status, and being stripped of a certain way of life, namely, political life that Aristotle valued as a good life for the active citizen in politics by reducing his life to a simple animal existence. The state, led by internationally supervised oligarchs, narrows the resistance and political action to the impossible by limiting it within the framework of electoral democracy as a race for popular vote for representation in state political bodies. This power, political action not only limits within a procedural space of political representation but also punishes citizens who seek other ways of political activism to jail.

With this Asstria treatment, power threatens each of us that any activism or political resistance outside the framework of the democratic race procedure for voting and occupying state political office will be punished with imprisonment, isolation or division from the community, except from proper legal protection and by the mercy of anyone who has the will to conduct public trial, brand, slander, and perhaps even kill. Thus, sovereign power sends us a message: accept democracy and vote, and give up political resistance, protest peacefully instead of resisting or combating the privatisation of the state, the criminally government; in a word, abandon political life and active citizenship; and obey the sovereign by becoming a biological animal that leads to life by being preoccupied with how to find food and shelter to survive days. That's what political power wants: to get out of the political realm of conscious and active citizens and live like a living, living creature.

Bloodlust

Moreover, Astri as a suspected terrorist was also exempted from adequate state protection in the sense that the terrorist's mark charged the burden of public judgment before the court issued the verdict. They are killed politically, and no one is responsible for his suicide. It goes “ by “homo sacerin”. “In Kosovo, ahtisarian who is increasingly taking on the form of an international sultan ruled by the international hegemony and their local vassals: oligarchs and clan groups called “political party”, a citizen who will not agree with the status quo (like the “the sanctity of the family and honour” in Canon) and the unfair order of non-exic installed by local and local power (x <8> and the protection of the local person and the clergy<> The State does not kill him, nor does it call to account those responsible for his own suicide, nor those responsible for the trial or priority. So the state does not take revenge for a political citizen.

Justice

However, “avenges “is valid for a tribal society that is of the zenith or prestige, and that avenges blood by washing blood with blood (because in Canon “Gjaku s%hupe never”) and thus rates blooding blood as a mechanism of justice, in the absence of state mechanisms, whose tribe is dishonored (from killing a member) is known as <x4thgri> to bring justice to the ground. However, if we want to build a modern society, to understand justice, not as revenge (“rebut as a return to the law (“restitution”), Astrit should not be treated as a member of its “political tribe, or relatives, but as a member of civil society and political activist. Justice for Astritis should not exclusively seek his family and political subject, but society. Revenge “rebutive” would only have forced the tribal culture of the community without a state and would not be a step towards building civilized society with the state.

In other words, Astrit's blood is valuable, but not just for his biological and party family, but for the whole society. Astrit's political spirit will find comfort only after his political “blood” is repaid. The Astrit should not go bloodlust, that is, “his blood” should not be allowed to go down. Therefore, “The Justice for Astrin” is calling to repay its “blood <x677>, his political sacrifice. Otherwise, Astrit didn't kill himself or anyone else (no matter which version he believes in) but the mother “the country's Quartodeciman”, so he killed the whole community, the whole society. Subtitles: ” is a motto not to use “to quash “ ”, so let's not forget the tragedy of a political activist and let him go bleeding. Astri's forgetting would be his second and final murder. This time from the community. Therefore, the quest for justice for Astritis is active for a society that wants to lead a busy and active political life.

Astritis, as a personification of political activist, should not go “bloodshakes”. His political death calls for revenge. It should not go “ “Hakim” means not to agree with the murder of political activism and not give up the right to resistance and political activism. In other words, let's not agree to turn into “homines sacri” that are stripped of political life and that we can only lead biological lives as long as we live. The lives of political activists after Astrit should not be vulnerable, endangered, and threatened by anyone.

In a word “Astria Justice! ” must be understood as a call not to miss “ call the responsible authorities who persecuted him In whose hands he died, did not treat the investigation of his death with seriousness according to standards required by law, as well as the political organization he acted on, as long as it can be reproved for not being guided according to a thought - of organizational theory, As her leader acknowledgedYet, it may be that by urgent tactics and individual or group trends within the organization!

The Justice for Astrin!” means the insistence that we rethink the state's relationship with the political activism of citizens and power with the civic and party opposition, but also the causes of political organisations and the means to advance them.

Subtitles: ” means that we disagree with our status as “homines sacri”, like souls between biological life and the death of the political soul. This disagreement starts from Astri. We can't agree with Asttri as “homo sacer”, bloodbath and popes to be sacrificed in our political rituals for secular ideals or vows: freedom, democracy and self-rule!

Subtitle

I started this writing in order to publish it on the occasion of the anniversary of the death of Astrit Dehar, whose tragic end has long followed me. But I couldn't finish the day I planned. I had apparently not recovered from the shock of the event; I was too thrilled to think about it or too shy to work out a thought about it.

But this isn't just a personal matter of mine, I guess. It's a joint that burdens our collective soul; a duo in our hearts that we can't overcome; a tragedy we can't imagine, because we don't have similar experiences to which we can compare. Yes, we had killed and committed suicide in southern and Serbian prisons before, including activists killed by the Unfriend's police, but we gave meaning to them: victims we have declared heroes, patriots and citizens who have resisted and sacrificed for clear causes. But with Astrin we don't know what to do. As a society, Astria's tragedy has not yet been named. What cause did he go for? Did the cause justify the method? Is he a hero? Is he a terrorist? Or just an ordinary citizen?

Therefore, rather than read as a support to a political cause or an excuse to use violence for political purposes, let this scripture be understood as a minor attempt by me to stick to the name of Astrit's tragic event, to the meaning and creation of an idea or naiveness for it, through an analysis of the power relationship with civic activism. If as a society we want political progress and roasting, we need to make sense of the events that take place among us. Otherwise, you have nothing to learn from history. So maybe we can start a new story of our political consciousness in new circumstances.

Taken from Sbunker.net blog