About the counterfeiting of history and shame of identity

My peers, or those who were born in 92л 9350, 9450, 95, and later ) have a huge and inevitable flaw in the country's perceptions and developments in it: they can't relate to the pre-year spirit. But they don't. The fault lies with older Kosovars, who perhaps from some sort of concealed and common shame, massively falsified their life - style and their past.

To be said: In the 1990s, 80s, 70s and below were far from glorious to Kosovars. It is said that we were systematically oppressed, and this oppression was done on ethnic grounds. That's partly true. This was the case during the 1990 ' s. And to a lesser extent, even in the decades below. Whatever the case, this requires a further consideration.

Since today's society is at an outstanding stage of urbanization, where people naturally approach cities despite asphalt, sewering, schools, small distance with city services and cleaner air in villages, as the first point of Kosovars' shame should be mentioned as what is known in our social vocabulary as "katund [ard]arism." This term defines not only a life - style centered on agriculture and livestock but also the initial stages of urbanization, the forged life - style, and especially the poor attempt to match regional and global trends. Not just in the dress, but especially in the mind. This has led a series of thoughts to be embraced incompatible, not as a result of internal wars, painful and natural family divisions, or as a result of sharp reasoning, but as a result of fashion movements. It is in the public sphere that the first signs of this optical deception are found. They appear to be mushrooms after rain, all sorts of people who can't reason their beliefs. And that in stuttering about such beliefs, they consistently refer to what is happening or said in the West.

Then, you have to say, Kosovars of those decades were say most of them functional illiterates. Most, however, were totally illiterate. Also, they were also malnourished, poor-assed, poor-assed. They paid far less attention to hygiene, shared fewer places for sports, books, and thinking. They were out of their history and out of their politics. And fed it through all these racisms of Serbs and other peoples. Racism is usually said to be the fault only for the other, the Serb, in this case. No, it's actually nobody's fault. Or, for those who believe in it, to God belongs the responsibility of the soul, or of those who believe in it. And deep down people know that. For those making progress, there was room in the Yugoslav system. There was room in the Ottoman Empire as well. There were places everywhere. Just as there was room in Carist Russia for Pushkin's African ancestor. Yet, Kosovars passionately preserved the primitive savagery and a narrow Canaanite culture, harsh and infertile. Which produced very little mutation. The evil of our invaders was that the conquest was overly physical. They didn't even try to interfere with this culture. The external effects or pressures are estimated to provoke some social dynamics, which are highly desirable for the canonical culture of early Albanians. It can rightly be said that the most invading is America today, that it was Serbia yesterday, and that the Ottoman Empire the day before. Yesterday, we could be physically violated, but today we despise ourselves by blindly wandering on Western values.

However, the spirit in which our collective authenticity was changed yesterday was harsh and narrow. Why not say that? It was in the savagery, banality, blood feud, patriarchism, Oda elders, dogs tied to colibs, ideal and mental sweats, our culture yesterday.

It should also be said that we have a very poor, extremely sad, and extremely unfathomable story. And not just say it, but admit it. And for that to be accomplished, we don't need any wizard's tricks, we need to learn the finest lesson in world history. History makes Peter Bogdan more important than Oliver Cromwell. More important than Sultan Mehmet Fatihu. Then, more important, Marin Barlett than Thomas Hobbs or Nichollo Makiavell. And so on.

This highly limited and flawed explanation of history, quite naturally, produces a strange point of view under which Albanians were the focus of historical developments. Center of the world. They try to Albanianize everything they can, and that's how they become ridiculous. There are also those generations of centuries, XVII, XVIII, XIX and XX. Part of our history, inexorably, is even illiteracy, blood as the counterweight of justice, cruelty, and primitive. A little later, part of our history became exactly the ridiculous trend towards liberal values, counterfeiting and internal shame for the past, the flight of hundreds of thousands of people in freedom time from their country, etc.

Other peoples have similar stories. Not glorious at all. Not cool. Not heroic. But on the other hand, there are many peoples who have stories far more glorious than ours, but that should not make us counterfeiters and impostors. History should not be seen as a sports contest. After all, we are not at the end of time, or at the most glorious time, as the natural claim of every generation [Ortega y Gasset] says, so we can do something good. However, I doubt that something good and lasting can rise above counterfeiting and an internal shame that is concealed in the expression of false pride.

In the meantime, we don't measure with phalologic concepts, still in the century. XXI, in terms of our autochthonity, regarding the land of the ancestors to justify today's territorial minority. The fallaby's minority. This raises the potential for romantic false nationalism, and for a suspension of the will to engage here and now.

As a result of an internal racism resulting from the lies we accept, but we cannot swallow, young and young people from Kosovo dream west. And I don't believe that economic motives are the only ones in the greatest momentum for escape. No, motives are also cultural. Our society has become indifferent, unwanted, chattering, with no will to become a nation. That's why he escapes when he's incontinently aware, or migrates like wild, hungry birds to Western countries.

Kosovars must make greater efforts to accept their past and history. This does not mean just accepting the bright parts of it. But especially those of the stalwarts, left in the dark, and that is when we think of ourselves more objectively. That develops complex shame and then corrupt behavior and submission.

Today, being essentially deceptive, Kosovars despise each other on the basis of values that their ancestors once had. It is the tendency to no longer have such remains. Not to look past in any present mirror. It's a strange refusal, not to one another as it happens to the peoples, but to itself.

Human rights activist Malcolm X, while he was in prison, had changed his last name from Lightle to RHX. His first surname had been attached to his family by their white slave, and therefore he had removed it. The Africans were torn from their roots and from their former culture. X, meanwhile, was a sign of freedom. The opportunity to define yourself as philosopher Slavoy Zizek comments.

But this possibility of self - determination is ideal for individuals who also find a way to do so. After all, in various types of culture, in various fields of art and sports, artists happen to change names and thus break off their own words. The British singer of Kosovo-born Rita Ora has done so, having the real name Sahatcija. Cutting off from the roots, however, is too dangerous for societies that by their nature are late, slow, and unrecognizable.

With Sartrian inspiration and logic, Zzizek fails to realize that this freedom, or identity void, is dangerous when given to the whole collective. It's hard to make collective definitions, embrace values collectively, or political convictions, or anything. So there's a huge chaos, and the possibility of any social cohesion breaks down. Kolestik does not stick together without a very strong illusion that is too deep. Fuck.

How can society, asks Michel Djerzinski at basics, exist united without religion? Such a question is still posed by various thinkers, and an adequate answer still does not exist. Otherwise, we'd know.

Imagine that view - a totally free society, with no value to keep it together. No identity. No moral restraint. Maybe we don't have to imagine it. It's in front of our noses. What keeps us together is not some particular value, or religion, but the strains, visas, impossible to settle down elsewhere, in another collective. Because, hand in heart, that's where most people ask for visa removal. He wants to leave the society he produced. As has escaped from the Muslim names of ancestors and grandparents. Like he left their clothes. From their culture. Of everything that constituted that being, with which today's Kosovar is supposedly proud.

Freedom is necessary for individuals, but never for society. A free society has the potential to become extremely criminal. As has our society. A place in constant chaotic motion enables the movement of those who have to move, individuals. Because the individual needs the movement to extend it to a solid earth. Individual needs his enemy, society.