Court attracts jail sentence warrant against Shukri Buy (Video)

The Constitutional Court in Pristina has withdrawn the ordinance against convicts Shukri Buja, to be submitted to the prison in Dubrava. The news of the “Justice Vow” has confirmed the tribunal's spokeswoman, Mirlinda Gashi. The court on June 12, 2017, had issued a warrant to the former head of the Lipjan municipality, Shukri Buja, to appear on July 24, 2017, in Dubrava Prison for the suffering of a 100-day prison sentence.

The case refers to the conviction pronounced against Boja on December 30th 2015, where the Constitutional Court in Pristina had sentenced Buya to a fine of 2,000 euros and a 4-month prison sentence on bail for criminal work “mos report or false property reporting”. The earlier commandment had come as a result of the decision made by Judge Hamdi Ibrahimi, then the president of the Constitutional Court in Pristina.

In the ruling of September 6, 2016, the convicts Buja had been replaced with a fine of 2000 euros in prison terms of 100 days because Bouja had failed to pay the sentence within the legal deadline. The spokeswoman of the Constitutional Court in Pristina, Mirlinda Gashi, for “Justice Trust” has said the act of prejudice against Shukri Buya has become all-powerful on April 4th 2016, and convict Bouja has been forced to make payment within 15 days.

According to her, Bouja has not carried out the payment, while the subject has been sent to turn fine sentences into prison sentences at the office for executing criminal sanctions. On the other hand, spokeswoman Gashi has indicated that convict Boya has paid the penalty by three months late, and that the office for execution by criminal writing has not been reported, so the same has been issued for a prison sentence.

On the other hand, Boña's defender, lawyer Bahtir Troshupa, on July 5, 2017, has filed urgent requests for the annulment of the decision made by Judge Ibrahim, through which the fine sentence had been replaced in prison sentences. In this request, lawyer Troshupa has mentioned that Buya, on July 13, 2016, has paid the 2,000-euro fine and the 70-euro paushal, as imposed by the Constitution of December 30th 2015, of the Constitutional Court in Pristina.

In his request to the head of the Constitutional Court in Pristina, Aferdita Bytyci, as well as the Office of Disciplinary Prosecutor, lawyer Troshupa has stressed that the actions of former head of the Constitutional Court in Pristina, Hamdi Ibrahimi, are illegal and are intended to harm Shukri Boja. In this regard, lawyer Troshupa has made a request to initiate the disciplinary procedure against Judge Abraham.

Former Justice Chairman Hamdi Ibrahimi now judges at the Department of Criminals at the Constitutional Court in Pristina, says “The Justice Vow “document for the execution of criminal sanctions is the tribunal's absolute condemnation under which the convicted one has not acted.

After all, according to Judge Ibrahimi, the terms have automatically been met for replacing a fine in prison sentences. The replacement of the fine sentence has been delayed for several months due to the court's workload, but it is still within the legally defined deadlines, within which criminal sanctions should be executed with fine”.

Judge Ibrahima stressed that on the day the penalty was served in prison sentences against Boja, in case of the case that they were in the office for executing criminal sanctions there was no evidence, paperwork, payment papers, or convicts that after passing the term of the sentence, the penalty was paid by fine. Therefore, according to him, in the procedure of executing criminal sanctions in the case of the convicted Boya, penalty with no fine has been paid within the term determined by bias has been replaced in prison sentences.

As for the request to initiate the disciplinary procedure issued by lawyer Bahtir Troshupa to Judge Ibrahimi, the latter has highlighted this is the most absurd claim that can be heard, and that can only be said by Bahtir Trosupa, whose continued pressure on judges with absurd requests for the initiative of disciplinary procedures and criminal charges, it has always been necessary to obtain the lawyer's license.

I personally initiated procedures against lawyer Bahtir Troshupa and have asked that his license be taken because of the pressures he is now making several years. Ibrahim has said that the court in the Buya case has not acted quickly on light, that right after 15 days a decision is made to replace the fine sentence in prison terms against convicts Shukri Bouja, not because he was mayor of the municipality, but because the court had other issues in line for deployment, and the subject of convicted Shukri Buja was not of absolute priority that are cases of detention, and from this burden of convicted Judge Shukry Bouja has benefited.