Comment from Periscope for the exchange of diploma themes: Why the UP should exist

On one Research done by the Praportr newspaper [functioning within the Adult Organization], what has been long been recorded was known and spoken in private spaces: many students graduate through diploma topics that are purchased by different people.

Research also revealed that the most serious university weakness in the country has resulted in a type of informal and criminal market, such as that of the diploma trade. And this can be viewed as just one of the many serious consequences of this weakness. Let's get him. The UPI prepares the teaching staff for Kosovo schools, which produce even more indictees. The UPP also damages the country's economy, through offering unprofessional and unqualified frameworks that are thrown into the labour market, but not helping it. Many large companies have repeatedly complained that they had problems finding frameworks for their companies. Pristina University, in fact, is responsible for most countries in our production system. Including knowledge. And it's just this fact that we're going to understand how many deceivers we're going to have that's going to fit in and on.

But back to the diploma themes. The Edguard Institute had asked a questionnaire, which resulted from students' own responses that 80% of them had been involved in the trade of subjects in question.

This figure is so high that it delegates the whole work of this institution. The question can rightly be asked: Why should the University of Pristina exist when most students cannot write a degree? But let's not stop by the students. The question needs to be further expanded: why should the University of Pristina exist, since professors fail to control the academic work of students, and therefore neither find plagiaratures, nor misconceptions between students' knowledge on subjects they have chosen? This seriously questions the reason for this institution's existence.

Beyond the graduation themes, at Pristina University we also have the widespread copying phenomenon on exams. Both of these phenomena, common and recorded, tell more about professors than about students. It is true that students perform the copying, or cheating, by their diploma themes, but these phenomena promote and inspire it in the complete inability of professors themselves. Very simple: it wouldn't happen if the professors found the tricks and punished them. It would not happen if the students did not benefit from it.

College and professional relations between students and professors are missing. As a result of this absence, communication between them is flawed, and it is possible that professors do not know the knowledge or progress that students achieve. This then allows professors to evaluate them by passing grade on false exams, and to study and approve the subjects of the degree that do not themselves write to students. But Preportr's research shows another disturbing thing: ready topics. Imagine the size of mass copying on exams. The professor must be basically unaware and unprepared to evaluate by passing grade, exams containing the same answers in some cases. Likewise, to read the same words over and over again, the same concepts, dozens of times and thus to approve those diploma themes.

Our society's failure to respond to such a thing is more symptoms than anything. The fact that such a thing happens so massively, unhindered by anyone suggests that we have great social interest to continue. So society itself is interested in its institutions of knowledge not really being institutions of knowledge. You don't want real, prepared professors. You don't want things to work out.

But this will increase problems and criminal activities. Therefore, it is necessary at Pristina University to have a well-advised political intervention that would stop the way things are running.