Eddie Rama's dilemmas

The removal of the majority's decision that there is no evidence allowing Tahir's arrest has further plunged the Socialists' attitudes into confusion. On the immunity commission, where the constitution does not allow them to examine the evidence, they insist on deepening them. And in the ranks of their party, where they can make [...]
The removal of the majority's decision that there is no evidence allowing Tahir's arrest has further plunged the Socialists' attitudes into confusion. On the immunity commission, where the constitution does not allow them to examine the evidence, they insist on deepening them. While in the ranks of their own party, where they can do whatever they want, they exclude “without evidence” the former symbol of yesterday's government.
The same confusion as in these SP decision-making acts was noted yesterday in the styled but divided speech by Edi Rama.
The prime minister's reaction, which could have taken off his hat both in shape and in terms of the architectural performance skills, was missing the most basic thing: the message conveyed to the public.
All those who heard it, at the end of it, did not understand the simplest thing: Was Saimir Tahir becoming a political process? Were the opposition, prosecutors and the media united to strike through the government? Was this a movement on the eve of starting reform in justice and the period before opening negotiations with the EU?
So, in short, whether we were dealing with a fact-free plot.
Or contrary to Saimir Tahiri was, according to Rama's labels, “a widow who shames the word man” and “The greatest disappointment of his life”? So in February, an official who's been involved in his post as minister to get rich on drug money and use them for the party's election campaign?
This dual language, these vague messages actually express Eddie Rama's confusion about his attitude toward the man who had him on his right for four years.
And this confusion stems from two elements. First of all, Edi Rama will not expect all the bridges they hold regarding Tahiri. Although he has already left all his responsibilities at the door, stressing that he did not know what was done in the ministry of order, that he did not even name them or communicate with the chief of police, so although he may be discovered in the future past to the former minister, he knows Tahiri is inside many secrets of this majority. Even in the interview on the “Opion” Saimir implied that there was enough material for all who were attacking him. And knowing this Rama doesn't want to be listed among them. He'll leave Tahir with the illusion that he didn't finally sell it.
But with that goal, Rama has another fear that forces him to play a double game.
If Tahiri seeks to give the impression that he is not releasing, Albanians and intercommers will inculcate the opposite message. The one sharing with the former minister. And for a simple reason. Rama is not yet clear what facts, which he does not know, are found in Italian wiretapping files. He does not have all the depleting information that would make him maintain his final attitude. So his messages are neither meat nor fish. So he even of “is” and of “mbron” Tahir. So he also treats it as the “human creation” and as the “viktim of a political plot”.
This dual language of the prime minister, stemming from his anxiety for the unknown next day, is also severely confusing the highest Socialist representatives. Unarmed with Rama's fine and colorful vocabulary, they are appearing ridiculous in front of the public. Because every time they appear before him they seem to talk about two different Tahirs. One to be exalted and one to be analyzed. Just as they did in the last few days, when they defended that there was no evidence on the mandate commission and lynching it, but for lack of evidence in the SP group. /Lapsy.al (original rule: Why is Edi Rama anxious










