There are details of the murder at Ferizaj: The suspect was the victim's girlfriend, had come from France

Under the request provided by “Justice Vow” on June 28, 2026, around 22:40, in Ferizaj, the “Seydi Sejdiu”, respectively, at the residential facility, rented by the father of the M.B. defendant, the defendant has now deprived the deceased F.H.

At the request, the deceased had now gone to the apartment where the defendant was in, and while staying in the apartment, after a dispute and physical fighting between them, the defendant takes the weapon of fire from now the deceased and shoots it once in his direction, causing fatal wounds, resulting in events in the country.

With these actions, she allegedly committed criminal work “murder” by Article 172 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Kosovo.

The prosecution has estimated that the conditions for the detention assignment have been met and that sufficient evidence exists that supports the suspicion based, including the report on the provisional sequentification of things, dated 29.06.2026, through which the firearm was seized, which was used in the conduct of the criminal work. As well as the H.R. witness statement, and M.N., which confirm the entire actual status presented in the device of this request.

A serious case has been reported Sunday evening in Ferizaj, where a dispute between a couple allegedly ended in murder.

While according to Kosovo, 24-year-old A. R, allegedly shot her boyfriend, F.H. About 10:40, leaving him dead on the scene.

The suspect has suffered injuries and was initially treated in Ferizaj's emergency, to be later transferred to KKUK in stable condition.

According to the prosecution, it turns out that the defendant lives and acts in France, while in the Republic of Kosovo has come for temporary stance, this circumstance indicating that there is real and serious danger that if left in freedom, he can flee to avoid criminal responsibility, which in this case will hinder successful development of criminal procedure.

Similarly, there is the danger that the defendant, if released, may influence the witnesses in order to change their statements in her favour.

The prosecution estimates that detention should be determined by taking on the heavy burden of criminal acts, as well as the conviction of criminal acts, as well as the circumstances under which criminal acts were committed.

“ ... The fact that after a dispute and physical clashes with the late F.H., the defendant has taken the firearm from now on, and has fired once in his direction, by taking life, the way of committing criminal acts, the use of fire weapons and the resulting consequences, respectively, the loss of a person's life, indicate a high degree of social risk”, in demand.

Therefore, the prosecution estimates that alternative measures are insufficient for successful development of criminal procedure.