5 minutes agoSupreme Dismiss the indictment against the Ministry of Justice against the Oda of Lawyers
Periskopi(2 hours ago)
(2 hours ago)The Supreme Court has dismissed the government's indictment of justice, respectively, against the Kosovo Lawyers' House, in the case related to the extent of the census spending in this Ode.
“HEED If the plaintiff's indictment: The government of the Republic of Kosovo ministry of justice, headquartered in Pristina against indictee: Kosovo Lawyers' Oda head in Pristina, “Bekim Fehmiu” p.nr, building “Arting” Fourth IV, as illegal", It's a decision.
The plaintiff was the Government of Kosovo, the Ministry of Justice, represented by the State Lawyer. The indicted was the Oda of Kosovo Lawyers. Under the constitution, the legal base of the demand was to declare lawlessness and abolish the altitude of registration spending in the Kosovo Lawyers' Oda.
According to the investigation, the indictment was delivered on June 12, 2026. During the preliminary review, the court found the indictment was not the “clear and understandable” towards the act in conflict. This conclusion, according to the Supreme One, hindered further examination of the foundation of the parachute. For this reason, the court charged the prosecution with correcting and fulfilling the indictment.
The justice ministry filed the indictment on June 18, 2026. In fulfillment, it called on the Supreme Court to abolish as illegal the level of registration expenditures at the Kosovo Lawyers' Oda.
However, the Supreme Court estimated that the case did not enter into its competence for hurtful consideration. According to the court, the act that was opposed by the ministry was not a sublegal act, but was linked to the expenses specified at “the request for registration in the lawyer's registry”. For the Supreme, this requirement did not meet the criteria of a norming sublaw.
In reasoning, the court referred to the Law on Administrative Conflicts, particularly the provisions that determine the competence of the Supreme Court. Under the ruling, the Supreme has the competence to review the revisions and, like the first and only degree, the indictments for abolishing sublegal norms. From the contents of the indictment, the court found that the case had nothing to do with revision, nor with the sublawing act.
As a result, the Supreme Court was not issued to assess the legality of the contested fee. Finally, the Supreme One found that the procedural conditions for further examination have not been met.
