Charged innocent accused of guilt and obligation

In the opening address, case prosecutor Duline Hamiti said the indictment is based on sufficient evidence and evidence, as well as will prove the accused committed criminal acts as in the indictment, “reports.Justice Vow”, broadcast Periscope.

The representative of the damaged B.S. party, and F.S., lawyer Shpatim Mehmeti, said he supports the prosecution's word and that he will submit a rich-juridic request for compensation for the damage caused.

While the defender of accused Amrullahu, lawyer Driton Muharremi, said the defence is convinced that neither the standard of reasonable suspicion is met in this case that his defender has committed the criminal act for which he is accused of leaving the standard of well-based doubt at large.

He also said it is basic right for the accused to be clear because without such a charge, the right to protection is violated, since the unjust burden of proven in cases of unclear charges falls on the accused.

The hearing continued with the hearing of the damaged B.S. party, in the quality of the witness, who said the accused did not recognise him but only after her sister now damaged F.S., had shown him that from now on the accused, who was her friend, had borrowed money worth 20 thousand euros for a fee in Turkey and that he now has pressure on returning the money.

She said she had contacted the accused now, who had told him he had borrowed that money and the people he has now taken from are asking for the money.

In this regard, she said that she had met again and again the accused, where she had even given her remaining money as much as she could, once five-six thousand euros, the next time 4 thousand and once two thousand euros, which she had totally given 22 thousand euros for a period of time of about three months.

According to the injured, the accused Amerlah had told him that there was pressure from those who had taken the money and that the price has increased due to delays in returning the money. / Periscope. /