Halil Matoshi: Albin Kurti got caught in the bluff!

His last offer for opposition political groups is only his strategy for buying me some time (for days) until the exile (August 2026) arrives, the MP's subscripts cannot be withdrawn!

Why does Kurt want three candidates?

Buff for the case to end in the Constitutional Court because opposition political groups have no sub-station numbers, even for two candidates, let alone for three! ?

1.

We did not include him in the author of guilt. Kurt's the only way.

The PDK was supposed to evaluate this <x0). ?

It's gone! ”

Legal argument. -

Under Kosovo's constitutional system, the signatures of MPs who support a presidential candidate can be withdrawn from individual deputies prior to presenting the candidacy in the Assembly, but after they are delivered, they are generally considered “concluded” (used) for that specific procedure.

However, the law allows a candidate to step down, an MP cannot unilaterally revote his signature, as if it were the currency in the Assembly administration to meet the 30 signatures requirement for a formal appointment. (Rast: No. KI 47/10)

3.

It is a constitutional requirement that a candidate should present the signatures of at least 30 MPs to be appointed.

(Law No. 03 L-094)

4.

Ex-Iuris request: MPs can only sign for one candidate, to sign a “act concluded” of will. Based on the principle of collective action, an MP who signed a petition could not possibly withdraw his signature after the act has been completed and presented in the Assembly, especially if such an act has been nullified. ( GUK: KI 47/10. )

5.

Let's say that if I vote President/a deputy can recall his signature, that's what devaluid's choice of candutes/jundidate for president/e because 29 signatures are unconstitutional.

6.

However, a candidate may choose to withdraw from the race, give him signatures in his invalid petition.

(https://www.te.gob.mx/vota elections/page/dowload/16375)

Kosovo's Constitutional Court has ruled that actions involving collective signatures of a minimum to be asked (e.g., in references) could not unilaterally withdraw the measure to complete “joint venture”.

This principle applies to the appointment process. ( DK, Rusty No. KI 47/10. )