Swiss court gives Kosovo another chance “dipped” in debt

In the debt execution registry (in a 52-year-old entrepreneur's Office) of a failed entrepreneur, the total of 115,000 francs freckle 24 outstanding debt claims that “balance”.

The migration office of Kanton Thurgaau, which in 2016 had declined to extend the permission of the Albanian residence from Kosovo because of its approach to debts, broadcasts albinfo.ch.

The person born in 1969 has received permission to stay in Switzerland for the first time in 1995 because of his marriage to a fellow traveler living in Switzerland. The couple have four children in adulthood.

The Justice Department and the Administrative Court had rejected Kosovo's complaint, writes Tagblat.ch.

His decision had been justified with a long list of debts. Twenty-four certificates of unscathed losses with a total sum of over 115,000 francs are listed here. Two of the companies it founded in 2009 were bankrupt.

The Administrative Court had concluded that the complainer was unwilling to pay. The serious circumstance was the fact that debt to the state, such as taxes and health insurance, broadcasts albinfo.ch. With his monthly salary of 5,200 francs, it is unrealistic that he can pay off his debt, according to the court in question.

In 2003 he was attracted to debt management.

Federal court criticises lower court argument

The Federal Supreme Court has long before returned the case to the lower court for further clarification. The latter has not given sufficient reasons why the debtor was responsible.

The lower court confirms the will, but does not provide sufficient reason”, the Federal Court writes.

The fact that Kosovo is trying to lower debts is also weighty is further expressed by the JFF. Then she asks whether the accused has been counseled or warned that his behavior is problematic from the point of view of Switzerland's right to stay, albinfo.ch conveys. Although the warning of 2003, it is not explained to what extent this warning is still relevant after 18 years.

Kosovar has received 20 criminal indictments over the years. It was made of violations such as parking bans, not setting belts, misuse of identity cards and billboards, property abuse and acquisition of stolen goods, employment of foreigners without permission, lack of accounting, and mismanagement.

According to the Federal Supreme Court, the lower court has not explained why permission to stay in Switzerland should be removed.