Today the next session in the case the UPI demands the return of land where the Serbian Orthodox Church is located

Today, it is scheduled to hold the next session in the case where Pristina University “has been held Pristina” indicted the Serbian Orthodox Church for proving the right to return to use of property in campus, where the church is located. Indicted in this case was the Pristina Community, but against the same court [...]
Today, it is scheduled to hold the next session in the case where Pristina University “has been held Pristina” indicted the Serbian Orthodox Church for proving the right to return to use of property in campus, where the church is located.
The indictment in this case has also been Pristina's municipality, but against the same court it has dropped the indictment, with the argument that this municipality lacks passive legitimacy in this dispute, reports the “Justice Vow on”.
The indictment in this case was exercised on November 29, 2015. According to the indictment, Pristina University” has been using Pristina” in Pristina since 12 December 1975, with the real estate used on the surface of 4.27.16 ha in Pristina, which has been reportedly used unhindered, as the same has been an integral part of the University Campus according to the University Centre's territorial plan in Pristina.
The indictment reportedly claims that the Pristina municipality, contrary to the urban plan, without a legal basis and illegally provided the only indictee, the Serbian Orthodox Church “J, to the use now. S. Serpska” in Pristina, which is said to have now usurped the opposing part illegally built the Orthodox Church “Sveti Sava”, on the surface of 0.54.12 ha, with a yard on the surface of 3.73.04 ha.
In addition, the indictment is said to be based on these facts now the plaintiff according to the law in force, as the bearer of the right to exploitation of real estate, has the right to demand for the return of now the opposing real estate, since the same has reportedly had it in legitimate exploitation and ownership of this property.
Also, the indictment reportedly states that according to UNMIK Rule No. 1999/24, it is estimated that all laws of administrative decisions and judicial decisions issued after the 22 March 1989, that are of discrimination nature cannot be implemented in Kosovo.
Also, the indictment says these actions are illegal because the same were taken under violent measures from the violent former Municipal Executive Council, so according to UNMIK Rule No.1999/24, all laws administrative decisions and judicial decisions issued after March 22nd 1989, that are of discrimination nature cannot be implemented in Kosovo.
By this indictment, The UP's is asking the court to approve the indictment and its prosecution to prove that the same has the right to exploit real estate in the total area of 4.27.16 ha, in Pristina. It requires that property be converted into free and unhindered exploitation, as well as compensate for the costs of the procedure.











