Mufti Ismail: The rule of law and Albulen Haxhiu, “

PDK MP Besa Ismaili said the Constitutional Court clearly says it is an independent body in defence of the Constitution and that it is the constitutional obligation of the Government and all institutions to respect and not interfere with its independence.

Ismaili referring to the VV and Justice Minister Albulen Haxhiu added that in popular language it says: Let's not go hop, without crossing the fence.

Ismaili said that despite political beliefs and representation, the political language in the ordinance “under no circumstances can decide otherwise”, there is no place in the rule of law.

Full Posting:

The rule of law and Albulen Haxhiu!

“Let's not go hop, without sticking the fence.” (Populor)

At the review hearing held on 1 May, 2020, the Constitutional Court's decisions argue three essential things:

1. The issue raised by the Democratic Party of Kosovo for the restrictive measures of free movement of citizens as the decision taken by Health Minister Arben Vitita, who was handed over to the Constitutional Court on April 17th, was deemed right by the latter, stating that the Constitution has been violated and seriously violated basic human rights.

2. Another issue of great importance in the Constitutional Court's decisions has to do with the importance of rule of law, which despite the situation created, pandemic time, no one has the right to ignore it and that rule of law institutions are fortified by the attempt to overcome it. And from this attempt, the government suffered badly in office for a very short time.

3. Acting Justice Minister Albulen Haxhiu had called the surrender of the Justice Ministry's Constitutional decision on our part, claiming that the Constitutional Court deals with the decisions of Government rather than the ministries and that it is not understanding the basis on which our subject has been called, naming it strange.

I have to remind myself once again of the conclusions, that the Constitutional Court clearly says it is an independent body in defense of the Constitution, and that it is the constitutional obligation of the Government and all institutions of the Republic to resuspect and not interfere with its independence.

Clear arguments, not only for the minister in office, who was dismissed for statements, but also for its co-partisans who handed over the Presife decree to the Constitutional Court, that despite political beliefs and representation, political language at the ordinance “should”, “no circumstances can otherwise set” there is no place in the rule of law!