Constitutional Court: He dropped two presidents, left the PDK without prime minister for six years, knocked down “Zieednica”

Of course, incumbent Prime Minister Kurti can also take the course to the Venice Commission to get an opinion on the case he considers a <x0-year-old people vote”. However, the Constitutional Court's past denies Kurti and his party's activists.

Kurti has only 26,27 percent of Kosovo citizens who participated and voted in the October 6th elections. But that does not prevent him from ruining the credibility of another institution, Periscope follows.

This institution had ousted Kosovo's first post-independence president, Fatmir Sejdiu, as he was acting simultaneously even the post-party chairmanship of the LDK. Sejdiu had accepted the Court's decision and resigned. This resignation had practically caused him the loss of even the LDK, and political marginalisation.

Another Constitutional Court ruling brought down another elected president, Behgjet Pacolli. In fact, Pacolli had done nothing in disagreement with the Constitution, but after just about a month, the Constitutional Court ruled that the Parliament had elected Pacolli president in anti-unconstitutional form because it had not respected the previous procedures.

Then we had the July 2014 Act, which effectively prevented the first party from having the exclusive right to form the country's government as it had hoped PDK.

This led to the PDK, although first in the June 2014 elections, not to take the most important position in Government, the prime minister. This position would meet Isa Mustafa.

In fact, this Constitutional decision would enable the PDK to assume the position of prime minister from 2014 onward, since even in 2017 it had to form a pre-election coalition with the AAK and Nisman, giving it to Alliance Chairman Ramush Haradinaj.

While another decision was the one for the Association of Serb-run municipalities, which belonged to an agreement signed by Isa Mustafa as Kosovo prime minister.

The constitution found that the so-called “Zieednica” did not comply with the Kosovo Constitution at 22 points. Such a decision could not make the agreement and form it.

In view of these, but its other decisions are hard to understand how credibility can be denied without having any single evidence of its ruin. /Periscope