11 minutes agoConstitutional Continues Measure of Salat Law Suspension by June 30th
Periskopi(6 years ago)
(6 years ago)Salaries of public sector workers will continue to emerge without growth. The reason for this is the Constitutional Court's decision to continue the measure of suspension of this law. Through a communiqué to the media, the Constitution has suggested that it has decided to continue suspending the law's implementation of the wage law until [...]
Through a communiqué to the media, the Constitution has suggested that it has decided to continue suspending the law's implementation of the wage law by June 30th.
“TA V SINCE the provisional measure imposed with the interim decision in the case of KO 219/19, dated December 12th 2019, until June 30th 2020”, the communiqué said. /Express
Full announcement:
The subject of the issue of demand was the assessment of the constitutionality of Law No. 06/ L-111 for Salaries in the Public Sector, declared in the Official Journal on March 1, 2019, and entered into force nine (9) months after publishing in the Official Journal. In his request, the foreman also demanded that the Constitutional Court impose temporary measures for “the immediate resolution” of the controversial Law, which the Court approved after the first review, on December 12, 2019, in length until 30 March 2020. In support of Article 116.2 of the Constitution, Article 27 of the Law for the Constitutional Court and the 57 rule of labour, on March 30, 2020, the court unanimously ruled: I. TA V EATHER the provisional measure imposed with the interim measure decision in the case of KO 219/19, dated December 12th 2019, until June 30th 2020; 2 / 1 TA V SINCE THE PELACE and the total application of Law No. 06/ L-111 for Salaries in the Public Sector, in length defined at point I. The court saw the continuation of the provisional measure as necessary for two reasons:
· The first reason has to do with the fact that the Court, after the provision of the provisional measure, has acknowledged a considerable volume of documents and comments submitted by various parties interested in its compliance and merits, which must be dealt with in relation to established claims and relevant constitutional and legal provisions.
· The second reason for the continuation of the provisional measure is the enormous volume of materials accepted by the Venice Commission and the constitutional/suptorated courts of the Venice Commission Forum. All these materials, including legislative and judicial practice handed down by the Venice Commission Forum member courts, must be analysed so that the Court can apply them under concrete circumstances, as long as they are applicable.
