Former adviser to Isa Mustafa: Hashim Thaci's Fearsome Orthodox Control on Institutions

Dialogue between Kosovo and Serbia has been under discussion in both countries for a long time, but so far there is no concrete date when they would agree on major topics which would send towards a binding international agreement through which the process would end with mutual recognition.

The final phase of the Kosovo-Serbia dialogue has been proposed to be led by the country's president, Hashim Thaci, but with this they are not reconciled to political parties in the country.

Faton Abdullahu, former adviser to past Government Prime Minister Isa Mustafa, has told Online Economy that dialogue with Serbia should continue, but that according to him, President Thaci should not lead this phase of dialogue, since the Government does not have the democratic majority which would control this process.

“I consider that so as opposed is the matter given the current consonance of the powers given that we currently don't have a literal, active, democratic majority that makes functional institutions have democratic control, regardless of who wants to go I'm that I'm not Thaci, even if it's Thaci or somebody else we should have institutions, we should have a majority that makes institutions work as they should not, so we should have hesitation and especially not be rushing into this final phase (4)>

According to him, Kosovo should be careful at this stage and proposed that it be transferred to extraordinary elections for the Parliament to have a majority that would control the issue of the dialogue leader, EO reports.

The “And it is determines that maybe it would be better for us as a society, as a country to go into extraordinary elections, in previous elections to reach an agreement and that it's most important to strengthen institutions, to have a majority that will control both the president and whoever else, but to control in a democratic way, that knowing what is being discussed, to control no unnecessary concessions, concessions that can harm our citizenship, the near future, these concessions can become and that is a big problem. I'm afraid concessions can be made in terms of association and there should be an institution like the Parliament that will have a majority, a power strategy that will do <x1.

While for the government's role in the process, Abdullah had only criticism, which said the executive is deliberately distanced from this and is leaving the way open for the president to lead the dialogue.

He stressed that the government has no control over this process, but that President Thaci is controlling institutions with autism, which, according to him, is dangerous to continue dialogue with this presidential control over institutions.

The government enters into the framework of what does not have the majority, the role of Government as it deliberately looks is to stand aside to meditate and see what will be done. This shows that it is being left to the current president to continue despite the fact that he will not have a control, in fact, is President Thaci who controls the institutions, who does so undemocraticly but with autism. We've developed an autism without democracy, and this is frightening that in these circumstances you can go into dialogue, especially in dialogue in the final phase which is very frequent and things will be placed that important”.

While the platform, which was proposed by the government, was proposed to reach a conclusion before Kosovo meets with Serbia, it withdrew, but from its proposal.

Abdullah's withdrawal of the platform from the Government views it as not serious, and according to him, the executive at the moment he saw the mistake on the platform drew him.

“The attraction of the platform is completely not serious, this shows that we have a rush, we have a poor approach to go, it tells us that there is no seriousness, there is no real democratic power that takes all this problem easy and decides professionally. It's written quickly, step on and gone, and it's scary that it leaves opportunities for development of many things that may be harmful, with which Government takes responsibility from itself and I'm going to put it elsewhere, but when it doesn't expect as much for other things that try to reverse mistakes that are wrong and withdrawal, maybe we hope it won't be what it will do in the next step, just as it stands to continue with other mistakes of this nature, he said.