4 hours agoLDK MP: Day-to-day Demarketing and Dissolation of Parliament
Periskopi(8 years ago)
(8 years ago)Democratic League of Kosovo MP Ramiz Kelmendi has stressed that the Assembly of Kosovo should hold a session in which Demarketation and Deparation of Parliament should be addressed. He in his Facebook account wrote that it is better for the country to go to early elections than to [...]
He in his Facebook account wrote that it is better for the country to go to early elections rather than make concessions with the Serbian List.
And we would also leave words and patriotic terms and traitors, as well as overcome a major obstacle to visa liberalisation. If anyone thinks there would have been financial damage to elections, I'm sure these damage is much smaller than some debt forgiveness and land expropriation, as well as international isolation of Kosovo citizens”, Kelmendi stressed.
Below, you can read the full post of Kelmendi:
Consequences of Demarkation '%s' with a decision-vote: Demarketing and Deforming of Parliament
We are witnessing what has been done for a three-year period of government, Mustafa in the coalition like the PDK and LDK, so numerous protests and large collateral, media and international damage, gas-lots and obstruction of parliament's work, accusations and harsh threats to the nation's traitors, as well as many other actions that have damaged thatOver and over again, the state and the future of the country, all of which are turning out to have been carried out in political co-ordination between the opposing political parties and the political parties in power aimed at undermining the image of the LDK as a party, that supposedly the LDK is not able to control a large radical part, and how the “pa-affect” to implement laws and keep control of its citizens, and that certainly didn't drink water in the international community, but came up to the public and went to the government, for all of these obstacles and these were the two terms already embedded in each of the children in the cradle.
Based on the above description of the Croatia of what happened, it turns out that today we are in a situation where numbers are lacking, the political power promised to solve big issues, the political sense of choice is also lacking, so we can also be said to have lacked and lack political unification on this issue, and this is not now, it has followed us throughout generations, and we have always criticised generations for not self-unification as we continue to empower it even more, so when it comes to power, we have little disagreement.
Why these disputes? All political actors during the elections target a better management of citizens and economic policies. Why must this be the fight? ? For the good of citizens or for the personal good? I think it's often misunderstood that governance should be a place to show strength, not wisdom, by relying on the wise word, the soft lamb absorbs two mothers. Looking at this to win the numbers for demarcation numbers, some Serbian list votes are also needed, or to be based on several LV votes, which are being split, in the first case the Serbian list has divided the mind of demanding the increase of Serb municipalities in Kosovo promised even on election campaigns, with this we are creating a large number of their municipalities and territories that we will have numerous international partners, and this can be used during international talks with Serbia, and these damage we do after one without a good analysis, we can afford to our ancestors who have cut back the Albanian way, which always harms the entire territorial partners, and all of those who are proud of the past, and the work-based decisions that are made of the past and the women, but the decision is often made by very good government.
I personally think that the political spectrum which I can't push these processes should put two immediate points in order in the Assembly with a decision-vote;
1. Demarkation
2. The Distinction of Parliament
I think these two proposals would have satisfied the entire Albanian political spectrum and would have left concessions with the Serb minority. We would also leave words and patriotic terms and traitors, as well as overcome a major obstacle to visa liberalisation. If anyone thinks there would have been financial damage to the election, I'm sure these damages are much smaller than some of the debts and expropriations of land, as well as international isolation of Kosovo citizens.
A vital political lesson must also be learned from this action, that, with this electoral system and with this large number of reserved parties and countries, there can be no space for red and red lines, since it turns out no one can take the majority and no one is good at making coalitions of narrow and dark interest, but the coalition is a political necessity for the good of citizens.
It is not right to rule on behalf of major decisions, and those decisions can never be realised by the political forces of the coalition.
Ramiz Kelmendi MP of Kosovo Parliament
