The Witness relates how electric power meters were illegally approved

In the trial for the “Cohler” type of witness quality, Sefer Avdij was heard. The Witness said that the Ministry of Trade and Industry had been appointed among the three commission members, who had the duty to review the company's complaint “Federal” from Turkey, which had come after the director's decision already [...]
In the trial for the “Cohler” type of witness quality, Sefer Avdij was heard.
The witness said that the Ministry of Trade and Industry had been appointed among the three commission members, who had the duty to review the company's complaint “Federal” from Turkey, which had come after the decision of the late director Blerim Sokoli to suspend two types of dignitaries.
I have been appointed to the quality of the expert by the Ministry of Trade and Industry. We've been appointed three experts. I was chairman of the” commission, the witness said.
In the concrete case, he said how the commission was tasked with treating and reviewing the complaint the company has filed “Federal” over the decision by the director of the Metrology Agency Blerim Sokoli to abolish the type of diplomats A EL-TF.04, AL-TF.04-1.
“The head of agency has decided to suspend two types, the company “Federal” has filed complaints about these two suspensions. For AL-TF.04-1, we found that it was a reasonable suspension. And at point two, we didn't see a reason why the dispatcher A was made. EL-TF.04, if it's about a license issue, he's self-suspected, but we haven't seen any reason and no document on what to do with the funding of this account” said the witness.
In terms of suspension of type A star EL-TF.04-1 witness said the commission had found out that the decision by Metrology Agency director Blerim Sokoli was correct.
After reviewing the complaint, we found that the Agency ruled out two types of dignitaries and we have found that the AEL-TF.04-1-type suspension for us as the commission was okay because under the test that was done at the Institute of Metrology in the Netherlands this rating had failed at three points” he said.
In the file that they had considered as the witness commission, the witness panel said that in connection with the AEL-TF.04-1 unit they were presented documents from other units and not specifically for the type AEL-TF.04-1, so on the basis of this commission it had concluded that the Metrology Agency had approved this type of headship by other measures.
About the character A. EL-TF.04-1 witness said even the Institute of Metrology in the Netherlands had found it had some problems.
I mentioned three reasons that he gave to the Netherlands Institute of Metrology and, as I said before, the variety of error due to harmonics, the impact of heat or temperature, and the repetition, that is, this measuring device under the influence of extreme, high or low temperatures does not measure properly”, the witness said.
Finally concerning the AEL-TF.04-1 commission had concluded that it was illegally approved.
“We have found that this rating was illegally approved because it was approved with documents of other diplomats”, said former member of this Sefer Avdij commission.
Avni Alidemaj's defender, lawyer Besnik Berisha, later asked the witness whether on the basis of the commission's decision it has been found that the decision of the late man Blerim Sokoli had been right.
I understand you've handled a complaint against the late Metrology Director Blerim Sokoli's decision. Your conclusion was that it was legal, right?
For one major, it was fair and legal, but for the other it wasn't. Legal was for AEL-TF.04-1 while illegal or unreasonable was for AEL-TF.04”, the witness answered.
Lawyer Berisha also asked him about the commission's decision, which had decided to suspend type A rating EL-TF.04, asking him to know if it was the same thing that the late man Blerim Sokoli, who in his decision had decided to suspend this rating.
Regarding the witness director's decision, the decision said it is not the same as suspension.
“Could you please tell us the decision on the two point of complaint regarding the operator's complaint still remains in force, but you have said that it should be suspended, so the result is the same, we agree that the chief chief's decision has been legitimate again because it has done the same”, the witness Besnik Berisha asked.
It wasn't legal because by the time we reviewed the complaint there was a past period of approval of the type”, the witness responded.
The Act against Vjollca Ajvazi, Drita Hamit and Avni Alidemaj was founded by Pristina Constitutional Prosecutor on October 6, 2015.
In this trial, the former director of the Kosovo Metrology Agency at the Ministry of Trade and Industry, now the late Blerim Sokoli, has been charged with co-operation and exploiting the official task, enabling the parties of the interest KEDS and those “Khler” to benefit illegally.
According to the indictment, since two Metrology officials Vjolca Ajvazi and Drita Hamiti have examined the documentation for the adoption of permission of the manufacturer's kind of digital electrical exchanger “Cohler”, Sokoli has agreed to illegally licensed licensed the digital electrical rating “AEL. TF.04-1” of the firm “Cohler” from Turkey.
Vjollca Ajvazi is accused of illegally recommending Sokoli allowing this type of designer, while Drita Hamiti is charged with helping Ajvaz with this recommendation.
The charge stated that the accused knew that these diplomats were incorrectly measuring.












