This is Vetevendosje's stance regarding the possibility of sending PAN '%s' to Constitutional

Conjufca that discussions on tables like she called by Avdullah Hoti from the LAA coalition contribute to resolving this situation.

Such definitions contribute to the solution of this situation. We're in an institutional blockade, so we need to address who's responsible for this blockade. Everyone's figured out what's technically the cause of this impasse. Everything in these sessions was legal. We are in a situation where a parliamentary group is not at the level of public responsibility under the Constitution. That's why we're trapped in the House Constitution. They're not coming to the vault, no one can do anything to”, Conjufca said.

We should determine whether we will respect the Constitutional Court's decision, that the right to introduce the chief parliament has the coalition or the party that comes out to win the elections. We ask the PAN to participate in the session as soon as possible and not become causers of the blockade, which they are deliberately doing”, Konjufca said further.

Konjufca also spoke of the possibility of addressing two questions at the Constitutional Court, whether coalition rights will be consumed PAN's proposal for presidential Parliament candidate.

In the practical sense, “complicates the situation. We give PANUK time to continue the blockade. That would be the result of such a decision. The Constitutional Court takes several days to provide answers. That would last up to a month or so. And that doesn't mean that the presumptions of the question become causers of time that PAN would use to prevent the chief speaker from proposing”, Conjufca said. /Periscope