Kosovo Privatisation Agency sells property without certificates (Document)

The Kosovo Privatisation Agency(AKP) in announcement for the sale of liquidation company assets in the 35th wave due to be held in September, also envisioned the privatisation of the “Grmia” local No.168 in Ulpiana district in Pristina.

While, in the offer published by this Agency itself, it is said that the AKP does not own documents that testify to the ownership of the facility In the announcement to sell the AKP, there is reportedly an agreement on carrying the right to building the facility, of the 29th. 03. 1978 signed by the National Public Building Company and NSh “Grmia. It is also said that there is no land to be carried by new buyers.

However, Vlora Konushevci, senior official for Public Relations and Media in the AKP, has said that despite the fact that AKP does not have abundant documents, they have a written agreement with the 1978 residential Enterprise (BVI), where it proves that from that time until today this asset is owned by the company <x1Grimia”.

There is a deal for this asset in the middle of then authority (tosh BVI), which has been dealt with management of construction land, which has allowed the social enterprise “Grmia” to build asset on earth, where it has given him permission, and also has given him access to use for infrastructure, water, sanitation, and energy systems. It presents the basis for us, which we testify that it belongs to the social company “Grmia”. In addition, since 1978, “Grmia” has had this asset in use. Never has the ownership of “Gmiss”, nor any legal or private subject been contested. Since then the AKP as manager or manager of social companies, “Grmia” has had this asset in management, so there is no dilemma” here, Konushevci stressed.

She has added that the AKP whenever it sets any assets for sale, has several mechanisms and some steps it takes to ensure that assets are in order.

We only act according to our mandate. If the municipality had any property claims on that land, so far it had to be announced to us, but there wasn't, so we've had these cases before and buyers haven't had any trouble knowing how much I know about those assets in their name”, she stressed.

Konushevci has assured that the AKP does not sell assets without basic documents. She has argued the deal with the National Company, because at the time, judicial property relations have allowed a social enterprise to build a public company asset on land, as is the case with asset in question.

“The AKP does not sell assets without documents or testify that the asset belongs to the designated company, as is the case with the assets of “germ”, but it should be given that in the past when this object was built, in 1978, the then judicial, economic and political circumstances of the socialist system have been other than those we have today. At that time, for example. Legal property relations have allowed a social company built an asset on the ground of the public company, for public interest or because of the urban plan, as is the case here in the same way with the association company Germ”, Konushevci stressed.