There is no known where thousands of Euros went during the management by Kadri Wessel

The National Auditing Office following the publication of the finance report has raised allegations of mismanagement of thousands of euros from the Kosovo Assembly. According to the audience's findings based on the LMFPP, budgetary division should be made in line with the goal specified in budgetary requirements. Costs for subsidies worth 60,000 dollars for KRC were included [...]
The National Auditing Office following the publication of the finance report has raised allegations of mismanagement of thousands of euros from the Kosovo Assembly.
According to the audience's findings based on the LMFPP, budgetary division should be made in line with the goal specified in budgetary requirements.
Costs for subsidies worth 60,000 dollars for KRK were included in the 2016 budget law, without the goal of sharing subsidies. This purpose was not specified with the request for additional division on the basis of the 2016 budget revision, writes Indexline.
The danger, according to the audience, does not specify the goal of granting subsidies in the case of budgetary division increases the risk of budgetary means being exploited for other unplanned purposes.
He has recommended that the secretary-general should ensure that, in the case of budgetary requirements, targets for granting subsidies have been specified and that the budget sharing takes place in line with the defined goals.
Other irregularities according to the Authentication was also the non-capital property record of the property register.
According to NR regulation.02/2013 for the not-financial Property Management of the Business Organisations, noncapital assets worth below 1,000, and stock should be registered in the e-rich registry.
However, noncapital assets worth below 1,000m, which were purchased before 2011, were still not registered in the stock of wealth, but in an internal registry in the ecstasy format, where all assets are recorded.
The danger, according to the audience, is that registering property in two different databases makes effective management difficult. Financial information about property may also fail to meet accounting requirements and reporting.












