Philosopher Faculty reacts to ORCA report Hasan Pristina's Dembles

The philosophical faculty describes this report as groundless, inaccurate, and biased.

Since this philosophical faculty is the target of this organization, their likes, and their funders, this academic unit reacts to informing the concerned (Candids of students), parents, institutions, and widespread public opinion of untruths, which are constantly promoting this so - called quality growth organization.

Hasan Pristina's second “Demblets report, compiled by ORCA published today, is based on systematic monitoring of the Economic, philosophical, and Juridical faculty over the past three months.

This organisation has announced that consultations, lectures and exams at these three faculties have been monitored in this report.

Here's the full reaction:

First of all, the philosophical faculty disputes the ethical procedures of research. For such a research management of the Faculty of Philosophy has not been contacted to obtain proper permission, which is clearly contrary to all procedures, followed for every research, worldwide. Which also casts doubt on the authenticity of information presented in the report. Also, research organisers have not contacted official persons to get the information needed to build research methodology. Based on such selective information, published research results are far from the truth.

Second, the Faculty of Philosophy management is responsible for monitoring the learning process (laws, exercises, exams and consultations) has no information, confirming the findings of this report, that this process has not developed in the context of what is required. There has also been no official or informal response on the part of students, that this process has had problems or difficulties in carrying out. As far as the times are being announced on the official website of the Faculty of Philosophy or the bulletins of relevant departments are respected and precisely respected, except when academic staff are allowed according to their official request to replace their speeches because of participation in national or international scientific activities or in cases of health emergencies. As a practice, these hours are replaced during the current semester, or first week after the end of that semester. All of this is evidenced by the signatures of students and professors who are possessed by the Faculty of Philosophy and are archived. These documents can access all interested people at any time.

Thirdly, all the official test deadlines in accordance with the UPP (janari, June and September) have been held and the exams have not occurred. Also, the test schedule has been respected, except in cases when reasonable students themselves have formally sought to postpone the test date. For public opinion information, department-based exam schedules are always done with a preliminary consultation with students in line with their dynamics and requirements.

Fourth, the staff of the philosophical faculty engage in all the links of the education process. This increases the accountability of academic staff in relation to work duties. This also develops the new staff to take on its responsibilities. Furthermore, this enables students to have broad communication and to have transparency regarding their performance. The philosophical faculty, it makes no difference whether we are dealing with professors or assistants, except in cases where this is necessary and required in statutes. All personnel are available to students, and that will remain our policy in relation to them. Once again, assistants are in the aid of professors in performing jobs and it is not unusual for them to monitor exams or hold consultations, increase efficiency, order and quality.

Fifth, in terms of consultations by academic personnel, the philosophical faculty confirms, they are held at certain times. Even consultations are held outside the schedule. Consumptions are also held in other ways, such as e - mail, telephone, and so on. However, in cases where students at a given moment have expressed reservations in this regard, the faculty management has addressed them in real and instant times.

The philosophical faculty expresses commitment to carrying out its duties. This academic unit requires management (Rectorate and Steering Council) of the University of Pristina to enable the acceptance of new academic and administrative personnel to continue in increased quality of learning, research and administrative services. Under the circumstances under which the Faculty of Philosophy works is pleased with the performance of academic and administrative staff towards students.

Finally, we ask students as well as representatives of various student organizations, including O RCA, to be more committed to their studies, to love university, and to respect professional people who work with them and for them. In this way their reports will be ethical, professional and accurate and will not only be the function of rationalising suspicious funds with specific purposes. The philosophical faculty and its professors are available to help all concerned, including the authors of this report, in design, realisation, data processing and reporting such and other research. )