Kosovo analyst shows session legal route

However, according to Parliamentary Job 9 of the Assembly, it is said that this session is led by the older MP or MP, and in this case it happens to be the party Vetevendosje as the largest political group.

Meanwhile, former head of the CEC, Mazum Baraliu, in a pronomination for éndeconcsonline, has explained this situation under two provisions of the Constitution, such as 66 and 67.

So Article 66 says the president's duty is to call the constitutional session of the Parliament, but if they don't do it then the Parliament meets without the president's participation and the session is led by the older deputy of the largest political group, which is the Vetevendosje Party.

While Article 67 of the Constitution 2 says the chairman of the Parliament is nominated by the largest parliamentary group, and this group is usually of political parties, and in this case the biggest case after the election result is the Vetevendosje Movement group, which as a political subject has 32 or 33 deputies.

Therefore, this paragraph is the speaker of the Parliament, nominated by the largest parliamentary group and elected by the majority of votes of all Kosovo Assembly deputies.

Next, Baraliu has shown that the country is in a pre-impeding situation with two different situations ahead of itself.

He says that the 2014 Constitutional Court's decision can be seen regarding the establishment of government.

“Well, the current situation in Kosovo is a little ambivalent (pre-promise) because we also have a 2014 Constitutional Court decision, where it is a little different because of the crisis that was at the time between the V LAN and PDK. Where the first one had decided to propose president of the Parliament, Isa Mustaf, and made a request to the Constitution to make the decision that the largest party or the pre-election coalition belongs to the adoption of the proposal for election of the Speaker of the Parliament. So we have a forwarding in the middle of paragraph 2 of Article 67 of the Constitution and the decision of the Constitutional Court of 2014”, it is expressed.

In the end, he has said there may be different political roadblocks depending on how the parliamentary groups from these respective articles or even this Constitutional Court decision will act.

“We need to see how the coalition will operate PAN, which is first in the June 11th elections. Then eventually Vetevendosje if it claims to apply Article 2 to 67's paragraph 2 so that as the largest parliamentary group to propose to the president rather than the PAN, which would certainly cause inconsistencies and perhaps clashes between different political groups and blocs”, it is over. /Indesksonline/