The drut resigns from the VVC chairman's position in Vushtrri: We'll overcome problems together.

Aida Dorg has resigned from the position of Vetevendosje chairman in Vushtrri. In a message published on Facebook, she says that the Movement We built together and in the face of the recently created circumstances each must overcome himself for the sake of the Movement. There are differences within us. This seemingly initial problem [...]
Aida Dorg has resigned from the position of Vetevendosje chairman in Vushtrri. In a message published on Facebook, she says that the Movement We built together and in the face of the recently created circumstances each must overcome himself for the sake of the Movement.
There are differences within us. This seemingly personal resentment problem is, in fact, political and ideological distinction. No difference between the goals expressed in the program, but especially the difference lies in the method. The difference in method is political difference then. You can't get through different ways and methods to the same goal. The method exalts or corrupts purpose. Let's face it, problems beyond me are organized lynching attacks, and instrumentizing people. No major purpose reasons the” instrument, Drguti writes.
Full message:
Dear Chairman Vizar Ymer,
Dear Movement activists,
For 12 years, we built this movement together. I have the full conviction that together we must overcome the final problems. This is possible and done by the will and contribution of all. Of course, during our work and joint activities, we have created real society and healthy relationships with each other. This has fulfilled each of us personally. But most of all, the Movement exists because of the goals we set for ourselves. In the face of these goals, each of us must overcome ourselves. So today I have resigned from the post of head of the V Movement Centre. In Vushtrri and from the Headship of Movement.
I know my expression has prompted reactions and concerns about the nature of problems in Movement. But my expression (unacceptably unacceptable) must be put in the face of a systematic campaign of slander, links and labels that has occurred for a year now.
Yes, there are differences within us. This seemingly personal resentment problem is, in fact, political and ideological distinction. No difference between the goals expressed in the program, but especially the difference lies in the method. The difference in method is political difference then. You can't get through different ways and methods to the same goal. The method exalts or corrupts purpose. Let's face it, problems beyond me are organized lynching attacks, and instrumentizing people. No major purpose reasons for instrumentization.
I believe the only way to solve the problems of Movement is to discuss them openly and with arguments instead of installing fear. But, ready to solve problems I still don't see. The only way is democracy, V Just a democratic one.












