Professor of UP: “NGOs are damaging the university just as past Yugoslav system”

Professor Shemsi Krasniqi, legalising at the University of Pristina's Department of Sociology, has written a column in defense of the institution where he works. It seems that the professor in question has been affected by findings that recently emerged for academic work done at the UPP. He specifically attacked a conference held in Swiss Diamond, of [...]
Professor Shemsi Krasniqi, legalising at the University of Pristina's Department of Sociology, has written a column in defense of the institution where he works. It seems that the professor in question has been affected by findings that recently emerged for academic work done at the UPP.
He has specifically attacked a conference held in Swiss Diamond, organised by KFOS, for the supervision expected to be UP's.
This protection is unstructed, unexploited, and fails to translate into clear messages. Krasniqi says that in the UP, however, good work is done. But even if that happens, should bad phenomena not be fought in the Universities? Of course I do. And civil society is doing a very good job in this regard. The volume of work should even be added - and political protests and solutions to the dire situation.
The organization Arise, recently through her newspaper, has published three research on how the study process is conducted in Universities, and how diplomas are bought and sold. The Scipata Diction shows that students learn about exams through uncircumated cysts, corroborators, collections, and other similar forms. This method reveals in the first place the terrible fragility of professors themselves who, being disabled, fail to stop this phenomenon.
In another research, it's about selling and buying diplomas. The Edguard Institute has asked students themselves, where 80% of students have done something like that. And if such a measure does such a punishable act, what does it tell us about their professors and colleagues ' relationship with students? And should the professor himself feel alarmed to write that scandalous column?
If that doesn't bother you, then what else should happen so that Professor Krasniqi can really be disturbed? And, why couldn't she through her mechanisms, the UPP itself so far to repair itself and not create conditions for such negative phenomena?
Read inline text: http://www.koha.net/Reform/60573/princat-with-pincete/












