6 hours agoPZAP rejects Oliver Ivanovic's complaint against Serbian List
Periskopi(9 years ago)
(9 years ago)The Electoral Panel for Ances and Parashtre (PZAP) has rejected the complaint of Oliver Ivanovic, chairman of the political initiative and candidate for mayor of the North Mitrovica municipality. P ZAP on 24 October has accepted a complaint by political subject chairman G I SDP, Oliver Ivanovic delivered via mail by October 21st, brought forward [...]
The Electoral Panel for Ances and Parashtre (PZAP) has rejected the complaint of Oliver Ivanovic, chairman of the political initiative and candidate for mayor of the North Mitrovica municipality.
PZAP on October 24th has accepted a complaint by political subject chairman G I SDP, Oliver Ivanovic, delivered via mail by October 21st, submitted to the Serbian Subject List, with which he claims Serbian List activists have sometimes damaged the posts, agings, the benefits of their political subject in North Mitrovica.
Just as he points out on October 19th and 20th, they have been covered by postkeepers from subject activists in question. The presumption of the complaint claims that from the political subject Serbian List has become the broadcast and release of the negative spot on TV TV Most, from Zvecan, in the 16 October to 20 October, with which hatred of the mayoral candidate has spread, Oliver Ivanovic.
With these actions according to the complaint claim, there have been violations of Article 4 of the No.11/2013 Electoral Order.
Several photographs of his complaining claims have been attached to the complaint.
The Serbian political subject in their response stresses that the complaint filed by Oliver Ivanov has been extended outside the legal deadline of 72 hours, as envisioned with Article 5 of PZAP regulations and procedures under.02/2015.
They add that in the photos attached to the complaint there is no evidence of any material regarding the activity of this political subject, and this may also be self-densonation because on the basis of such a fine, it can only be pronounced on political subject, which has been presented because from related photos it can be seen that GI SDP has placed propaganda materials in public places contrary to the law.
The panel has estimated that the presumption of the complaint in support of complaint claims has offered no clear and convincing evidence to confirm claims in the pre-proposed complaint, in the sense of Article 117 paragraph 3 of the Election Law where it has been determined that <x0 reposition for complaints and appeals by PZAP rests on clear and convincing evidence”.
