The case “Medicus”, witness denies signing in the document where the patient gives the kidney

Bogaj was asked by the prosecutor if she was part of this clinic's Ethics Commission, while the witness denied it.

The prosecutor then confronted the witness with a document in which before the Committee of Ethics of “Mediccus” the patient of this clinic, Yusuf Samir, had stated that she voluntarily wanted to donate the kidney without any compensation.

In this document with the clinic logo “Medicus” was also the signing of Flamur Bogaj as a member of the Ethics Commission, but he denied that the signing is his.

The prosecutor then asked the witness whether this has influenced him to cool relations with Lutfi Dervis, but the witness said he has the same reports with the accused urologist and has not requested clarification of Lutfi Dervisi's signing.

The prosecutor asked the witness whether there are friendly reports with Lutfi Dervis.

The Witness said that this is hard to define, but admitted that he had friendly reports with Dervis while showing that the clinic owner “Medicus” had requested legal services from him.

The Witness said that Lutfi Dervishi had gone to him on legal matters, had drafted some documents as requests as well as trading contracts.

The Witness showed that the trading contract was drafted 10 years ago and may not recall a few things, but he indicated that it was a building purchase, while he also mentioned a German doctor in his office with Dervis.

The prosecutor then asked the witness that after drafting the contract to purchase the building for the Medicus Clinic, he knew what the clinic's role was.

The Witness denied knowing the role of the clinic.

Witness Flamur Bogay further showed that he had treated his son at the “Medicus” Clinic.

The prosecutor questioned Lutfi Dervisi's behavior during the time that Bogaj was treating the boy in “Medicus”.

I've had a lot of trouble, I've had a 4-year-old son and he's been dying, I'm not interested in his behavior. Even today I don't care about his role, but I care about quality and trust him, not his” position, said witness Bogaj.

He concluded that if Lutfi Dervisi was released, he would go and be treated if needed. At today's session, the testimony was also preceded by Elbasan Dervisaj, but his testimony with favor was considered read and read.

In this trial, Lutfi Dervishi, owned by the Clinic “Medicus”, is accused of trafficking with human beings and organised crime, while Sokol Hajdini is accused of serious bodily injury.

Part of that judgment was Arba Dervishi, the son of Lutfi Dervis, but the procedure against him is isolated because he is on the run.

Urologist Lutfi Dervisi had been sentenced by the Constitutional Court in Pristina to eight years in prison in 2013, while Sokol Hajdini to 3 years.

The Court of Appeals had later confirmed Dervis's sentence, while Heidi had added her years to her prison sentence from three years to 5.

Then the Supreme Court retrialed the case “Medicus”, while the fugitive Lutfi Dervis was arrested several days after the Supreme Retrial decision. /Cashho. com