Vaccination of wandering dogs, street asphalt and supplies at Obilic once discovered violations in tenders

Managers and violations in public procurement continue to be among the most frequent findings of the National Audition Office (ZKA) in Kosovo institutions. Even in the annual report on the Obilic Community, several such cases have been found as a result of insufficient control in tender files and disrespect of legal requirements.
In auditing procurement procedures, shortcomings in four contracts have been identified.
According to the National Auditing Office, in the tender “the vaccine and treatment of stray dogs”, worth 107,160, was required for economic operators to possess three veterinarian technicians with at least two years of experience working from the graduation date.
The winning company had not met the criteria, but the municipality had rewarded it by contract.
“While, for two veterinarian technicians the evidence provided by the winning OE did not confirm the fulfillment of the criteria for the required experience. In spite of that, the evaluation commission had assessed the offer as responsible and recommended the contract issuing. ”
Even the tender file in the procedure for “Agricultural supply”, with projected value of 123,350, was not in full harmony with the LPP requirements.
“Concretically, economic operators were required to have circulation in the last three years, worth no less than 300,000, while the maximum limit allowed was $26,700. Also, evidence was required for similar supplies worth 350,000, while the maximum allowed limit was 185,025. ”
Meanwhile for the Assalmation project of several roads, the municipality had demanded that operators possess all the equipment and prove it, but then the tender was awarded to the company that s quite met this criterion.
“Daut Hashani, construction of the Breznica Channel and the construction of playgrounds near Dardhitt”, the Contacting Authority had demanded that economic operators possess the required equipment and mechanization and that they give evidence of ownership (litreza or DKD customs), while the winning economic operator had witnessed the availability of two equipment through the agreement for the use of cars with another economic operator, even though the tender file was not presuming the use of equipment on the basis of charter agreements or other economic users. ”
Public prosecutorial regulation violations have also been found in the report “professional maintenance of the Co-operation System . . Continued work”, where the municipality had signed public framework contracts at the price of units projected 345,000, including +/-30% deviation, contrary to legal requirements.
The audience has found that determining non-proportional criteria and weighing bids as responsible without sufficient evidence increases the risk of limiting competition, equal treatment of companies, and contracting for operators who fail to fully meet tender requirements.
Otherwise, the Public Procure Law envisions that contracting authority should give the public contract to the economic operator who has handed out responsible tenders should not double the anticipated value of the contract, writes Klan Kosova, broadcast Periscopi.











