Supremeian rejects detention cuts from Mihajlo Milovanovic, suspected of property fraud in Veternik

The Supreme Court of Kosovo's “Colegy in the criminal case against indictees M.M., suspected that the remaining attempted fraud “ ”, “clear document” and “Legislation of false content” has refused the request for protection of legitimacy filed by the defendant's defender against the Constitutional Court's rulings in Pristina and the Kosovo Appeals Court”, the court ruling said.

The Constitutional Court in Pristina, the Department for Criminal Affairs, with the PPRKR ruling.N.275/2025 of the 25,03,2026 defendants M.M. And J.J. It had continued their detention period in two months, from 25.03,2026 to 25.05.2026.

In the complaint procedure, the Court of Appeals of Kosovo, with the PN ruling. I.r.384/2026 of the date 10,04.26, had refused complaints of the defendants' defenders to be groundless and had confirmed the first instance.

“The request for protection of legitimacy has been exercised by the defendant M.M.'s protector, lawyer Visar Vehapi, with proposals for the rejected decisions to be annulled and the case to be returned to restoration, or changed by freeing the defendant from custody, respectively, replacing house arrest and other restrictive measures. The Supreme Court, after reviewing the paperwork and claims submitted in the motion, estimated the request is unsubstantiated”, the court says.

According to the Supreme Court's assessment, it results in suspicion that the defendant may have committed the criminal acts for which the investigation is under way.

The Supreme Court estimates that there is a legal basis for continuing detention due to the risk of escape; the impact on witnesses and on co-accusants; the annihilation of evidence or co-ordination of statements aimed at avoiding criminal responsibility; and the danger that the defendant, if left in freedom, will repeat criminal acts of the same or similar nature. The defendant, along with other people, allegedly forged property documents and attempted to register them at the Kadastrian Office in the Pristina municipality for the P- number P- parcel, with its surface of 5976 m2, located in Veternik. The Supreme Court found that the courts of lower institutions have provided sufficient and based reasoning concerning continuing detention and that in concrete cases no criminal procedure provisions have been violated”. /Periscope