2 minutes agoLawyer Jashar: The court emphasises that the secret vote for the Speaker of the Parliament is not in advance with the Constitution, nor with the Order
Periskopi(a year ago)
(a year ago)Kosovo lawyer Arber Jashari has reacted after the Constitutional Court's decision ordering the Parliament to be constitutionalised within 30 days, Periscopi reports. He has made a brief summary of the Constitutional Court's Act, until he stressed that the secret vote is not meant for the Constitutions or the Labour Rule. Full mail [...]
He has made a brief summary of the Constitutional Court's Act, until he stressed that the secret vote is not meant for the Constitutions or the Labour Rule.
His full post:
A brief review of the Constitutional Court Act:
The deputies' mandate and the Assembly's mandate are directly interconnected. The MP's mandate starts only after the Parliament's establishment.
The right of the largest parliamentary group to propose the Speaker of the Parliament is conditional on providing the necessary majority, so 61 votes.
A failure to elect the Speaker of the Parliament does not automatically lead to new elections.
In Constituve Seanca, MPs should stay in the hall and vote “for”, “against” or “abstenim”.
-The Assembly should be held within 30 days of publishing this act in the Official Gazette. In concrete cases, the deadline is 26 July 2025.
The Court points out that the secret vote for the Speaker of the Parliament is not in advance either in the Constitution or in the Labour Order. It cannot be linked to other rules of regulation that prohibit the change of voting in the same session.
The Court stresses that the rights of political subjects should be exercised in accordance with the spirit of the Constitution, in trust and through cooperation, not through blocking processes.
I swear to God!
