KDI Chief: VVI is responsible for blocking

KDI's KDI Imset has spoken shortly before the start of the session, where he holds the responsibility for blocking the Assembly's institution falls directly over VV, Raporon Periscopi. According to him, parties that have been in opposition have no legal and constitutional responsibility to vote for the VVA candidate for the Speaker of the Parliament. “Therefore, if [...]
According to him, parties that have been in opposition have no legal and constitutional responsibility to vote for the VVA candidate for the Speaker of the Parliament.
“Therefore, if the VV fails to secure most through compromise and co-operation, then the responsibility for the impasse does not fall on the opposition, but on the self-ex1>, he said, among other things.
Full response:
The party that has come first in the elections, if it has not won a majority of 61 mandates, has neither a moral right nor a political claim that it can rule alone without entering consensus negotiations with other parties to achieve the parliamentary majority. Therefore, if the VV fails to secure much through compromise and co-operation, then the responsibility for blocking does not fall on the opposition, but on it itself.
Opposition parties have no constitutional or political obligation to vote on the Speaker of the Parliament or the government of a party that does not have the majority. The demand for votes of other parties without political agreement is absurd parliamentary and shows a lack of responsibility for the constitution.












