Court appoints detention measure three persons for war crimes

After the hearing, I appreciate that the legal conditions for appointing the detention measure for defendants B. T., M. I. and N. C, since there is suspicion that the same has committed the criminal war crimes against the civilian population. There is doubt based that the defendants B.T. and M.I., the quality of the official members of Pristina Prison and the parallel in Lipjan, during the period of armed conflict, respectively, the war in Kosovo 1998-1999, in Pristina Prison and in the parallel in Lipjan, in association with other officials of these prisons by acting in opposition and violating the rules of international law during the armed conflict, respectively, had systematically tortured Albanian prisoners, torturing them in a way by means of various means as a metal stick, as well as being kicked and destroyed, until the alvans, causing physical injuries, if they were reportedly injured, they had reportedly tortureded by brych.

While, the N.C. defendant, allegedly in the quality of the official-guarded Pristina prison person, - Paralylja in Lipjan, during the period of armed conflict, Kosovo's 1998-1999 war, in Pristina Prison, respectively. -Parlia in Lipjan, in association with other officials of this parallel, acting in opposition and violating international law rules during the armed conflict, respectively, had systematically abused Albanian prisoners, tormenting them in a decomposing manner as rubber bats, kicking and punching, until tradeoffs, causing bodily injuries.

The trial found that there is real and reasonable danger that if defendants are at large, they can escape to avoid criminal responsibility, influence witnesses, including the injured, can cooperate with other associates involved in this criminal case, and try to eliminate or harm material evidence. The court estimates that the burden of criminal acts is severe nature, so the appointment of the detention measure is necessary in this criminal case and that any other measure would be insufficient, for successful implementation of the criminal procedure”. It says further on notice. /Periscope/