“FOL sees it for electoral effect: Contrary to Democratic Principles and Values

Among the first-read and later fast-read amendments bills, the Law for the Bureau of Confiscating Unjustable Wealth, the one for affordable residence and mandatory healthcare.

Viona Bulnjak from Movement Fol, has told the online economy that at last night the bills were not supposed to be adopted, as the country is not in a state of emergency. The same connects them for electoral effect.

She has said the Assembly would have to continue working until January 10th next year.

We're almost a year of almost waiting for these agenda points to be adopted with time and what happened last night is just a political campaign made by the ruling party, trying to outrun all of these points of the day's order overnight, with which we're not even in a state of emergency, and there's almost very accelerated procedures since the Assembly was supposed to continue the work until January 10th under the Kud country's regulation and they decided last night that they exceeded some quick procedures by the most important laws for citizens, thus violating the principles of this democratic country.

The criticism is also over the passage of the Bill for the State Bureau for Verification and Confiscating of Inexcusable Riches. According to her, the same is contrary to this country's democratic principles and values, as it has not been put in public consultations.

The most important one with which we've almost had interest and expected how many years for it, is normally the Law for Bureau and Confiscating and Verification of Riches, which has been passed on the first reading and second reading within a few hours, so with an accelerated procedure which is contrary to the principles and democratic values of this country, because the same has not been put into public consultations, there has not been a public hearing, and the adoption of this law itself shows that these alone have worked for an electoral campaign to adopt and perhaps to present it as an election and a campaign that we know too much about the content of this bill, and that the government has only been able to change it in the past night's decision, and that the government has not yet been given a claim of self-decision.

“In fact, the very existence of this session without the presence of the opposition makes us doubt that here is a organisation of the Vetevendosje Movement so that we can postpone this session to the very end as much as the MPs have the will to adopt points as much and say that we've done work on this mandate, even though the regulation envisions that sessions will continue, so we can't say that we have finished with last night's Cup hearings, and that it's not normally on the standard, and that it's in the value of this state until midnight, to approve of certain agendas, which were expected months of the benefits, and that the MPs have not had the previous session, but that the project was passed down to the opposition.