Rama Progress Tent 12 million, O Panel The ESP ignores its expert's recommendations

The Pristina municipality tender, amounting to 12m euros, was being considered by the Procuring Organisation. The expert in this institution had recommended that the entire tender return to review after he had found out that the municipality has done write, but O The EPS has ignored its expertise, allowing new procedures to develop for its implementation.

“Passing the OE “geoconsul& CO”, no. 2023/0161, dated 24/03/23, while the AK Assembly of the Pristina Community's decision regarding the Consulence procurement activity for the establishment of the Capital's Architectural Service for the Needs of the Pristina Community, with a number of procurement 616-22-7431-3-1-2, initiated by the AK-K-Couth of the Pristina municipality. 2. Allowed, Pristina Commission contracting authority to continue further, with procurement procedures related to procurement activity: “Consultancy for the establishment of the Capital's Architectural Service for the needs of the Pristina Community” with a number of procurements: 616-22- 7431-3-2<5>, states the DPA decision.

Days ago, Democracy. com reported that the expert expert in Procuring Organisation (OSHP) had further deepened doubts about Rama's 12 million tender of progress, indicating that the institution's expert had demanded that the tender in question return to review.

“Expert consideration, requires the AK to turn the subject into reevaluation and respond to the complaint claims, therefore I appreciate that there are procedural violations of the provisions of Article 108/A, since, as the AK was highlighted, has provided no answer to OE complaint claims. Based on the above-mentioned clarifications, the examiner proposes to the panel that the complaint by OE be approved as based, the AK's decision on the qualifications of economic operators and recommends that the subject be returned to review”, said in expertise.

And this recommendation given by the “Court of Tenders” seems to have deeply disturbed the chairman of Pristina himself.

Democracy. com reported yesterday from sources within the OSHP that Rama had made another tactical move, meeting the OSHP chairman. These sources have told of Democracy.com that Rama Progress has had a secret meeting with OSHP Chairman Vjosa Gradinaj-Mejuani, who has neither been denied nor confirmed by O The E.P.

Democracy. com had sent questions to O HOMEs regarding this meeting but even after confirmation that they had accepted the questions have yet to answer any questions.

During March of this year, the Pristina municipality had published the results of the technical part, where three (3) economic operators with scores were assessed, who would then participate in the opening of financial bids scheduled to take place on March 17th.

The Pristina municipality's publication said that “Economic Operator, Capital architect Service”, was estimated at 92.40 points. And “Operator Group “geocolnsult & Instant Al” is estimated at 75.40 points and “operators F and M, Box, Sead Consulting” with 66.00 points.

And here many doubts have been raised about favour done by the Pristina Community towards the operator “The architect's service of capital”, which is strangely named as the tender itself proclaimed by the Pristina municipality.

Person responsible for the announced economic operator, the winner, the Astrit Nija, who is known as an architect in several projects, but also as a beneficiary of many tenders. Similarly, Nija and the group of architects involved in this group are known for their close proximity with Rama herself.

On Nize's behalf are three other companies, but not that which has been recommended for the benefit of the tender from the Pristina municipality.

O's Complete Decision DSA: