16 minutes agoTent 38 million: More than ten experts give rights to Periscope's findings for violations by Libran Ali's ministry
Periskopi(3 years ago)
(3 years ago)The Ministry of Environment, Space Planning and Infrastructure, led by Lieburn Aliu, has planned to sign five contracts worth 38m euros for the tender that will pave the way for the expansion of the National Pristina route, Besi Podujevo. Periscope, days ago, has made an analysis of the selective criteria set by [...]
The ministry has decided to proceed further on the economically favourable Tennder (TEMF) and go directly on the assessment of contract giving, but the criteria it has set in assessment, There are criteria involving another selection process.
The difference between the selection criteria and the giving criteria should be clear, as two types of criteria are used in different phases of assessment, which serve different purposes.
So, as seen by The tender fileFor the evaluation of the contract, 5 more tangible assessment criteria have been set.
But three of them are contrary to the Law's provisions for public procurement and procurement regulations, since they are the criteria for greater appreciation.
The ministry has defined the reward criteria: 1. The price will be estimated at 60 points, 2. Experience of similar work - 10 points. 3 The experience of the proposed main staff 10 points, 4 equipment and mechanization -10 points, and 5, Dynamic Plan - 10 points.
Periscope has found that three out of the five criteria for the evaluation of the contract, have to do with the selection criteria, and as such, no one should be set for assessment, as the ministry has set the requirements for contract giving.
Request: “The price” has been in line with the law.
The request “The company's experience (reference)” is determined under 69 in the Public Procurement Law, is qualification criterion and no criteria for contracting.
“Staff experience”, and this is also determined in Article 69 at the LPP and is the qualification criterion.
“Pajisjet” ) is defined in the LPP's Article 69 is the criterion for qualifications.
The request for “The Dynamic Plan” has been okay.
Selective criteria apply to determine which economic operators (the bidders or candidates) are qualified and potentially able to meet the contract. They answer the question: “Who can do the job?”
The giving criteria apply to determine which tender that meets specifications and requirements (from those qualified and potentially able to conduct the contract) offers the best solution.
The difference between selection criteria and reward criteria is very important.
Selective criteria focus on “ferator” and input criteria focus on “ference”. A clear distinction between the two criteria should be maintained throughout the procurement process.
What do experts say?
In regard to this tender, a response to the procurement expert has sufficed, Vlora Feriz to include other experts.
“You know that with the LPP, we can reward the contracts with the cheapest price or Economic Tender, the most favourable (TEMF). What do you think, in the case of TEMF, are these sub-creators consistent with the LPP:
- The price
- Experiences of Similar Jobs 10 points
- Proposed main staff experience: 10 points
- Equipment and Mechanization 10 points
- The dynamic plan: 10 points”, Feriz wrote on the social network fb, referring to MI's tender. Feriz, who has participated in drafting the Public Procurement Law and procurement regulations, has received many comments from experts, procurement coach manager. All have found that the ministry has committed violations in this case, and are surprised how the Public Procuration Regulatory Commission has not yet reacted. - KCPP, the organ that honours the contracting authority to open tenders in line with the LPP and other procurement regulations.
Abaz Foniqi He's been a procurement manager for years in the Kline municipality.
He wrote:
I've been expressing myself long ago when I saw this in a proceeding from the Ministry of Infrastructure. And this was for the Bessy-Podus Highway... some news. With CRPP harps monitoring the process of allowing publicisation with these criteria. Even staff was valued for years of experience, not quality! So a retired idge would bring points to a subject if it was to engage”.
Even the senior procurement official in the Pristina municipality has reacted, Flag Sal God.
There's no need to be able to access “apart from point one and five other points. There are many other elements you can point them into the giving criteria”, he wrote.
Even procurement expert Ibardia Stone has gone that “1 and 5 are in line with the LPP, while others differ against”.
Former KCPP board member involved in the debate, Sami Uka.
The “other than that are contrary to the legal provisions in force (Cirtizens 2.3 and 4 are qualitative criteria) and in no way provide any more preferable economic tender”, it has gone.
Most of those who have reacted are certified public procurement trainers in Kosovo, meanwhile, have reacted and other procurement experts.
Below you can find Periscope writing published days ago:
