The prosecutor seeks the punishment of Agim Ademi

On Friday, at the Pristina Foundation Court, the final word was given in the case where Kosovo Football Federation chairman (FFK) Agim Ademi and Muharrem Rama are charged with threatening and attacking the injured Dritro Kadolli, urging him to provide 30 thousand euros or a “BMW X5”

Initially prosecutor Eliza Bajrami said she stands in whole next to the final word given on May 18th of 2019, proposing to the court that following the administration of evidence two indictees Ademi and Rama to punish under the law, reports the “Justice Vought”.

In addition, prosecutor Bajrami said that unequivocally accused Ademi and Rama have committed the criminal work they are charged with after, according to her, all actions taken by the accused complement the criminal work figure they are charged with.

Meanwhile, the lawyer of the accused, Ademi Fis Murati, first delivered the final word in writing, briefly evading it, saying the prosecution has been brought against material and formal provisions.

Lawyer Murati added that prosecution for criminal work “taskation” was signed on September 12th of 2022, and that for the criminal act charged by his client under the Penal Current Code requires at least three people to do the same, and that in the concrete case, we have only two accused.

The same judge proposes that the accused Adam release him from the indictment.

The final written word and the lawyer of the accused Rama, Ramiz Krasniqi, who briefly said in this case, lacks the essential element of the criminal act for which Rama was charged, and this element, according to him, is the group's lack of criminal activity.

According to lawyer Krasniqi, since there is no criminal offence, because there is no group to commit the criminal acts with which the accused are charged by the prosecutor and the fact that the prosecution has been signed, the court proposes to issue a free trial.

“Therefore, I stand by the word you have written, I propose a free trial because we have only 2 people, and for paragraph 1 criminal acts have been prescribed, the Krasniqi lawyer said.

After the final word was issued to them, the judicial examination was proclaimed by Judge Sabit Sadij, and the declaration of judgment was scheduled on March 15 of this year.

Parasely in this session have been managed as material tests such as “Muharem Rama police report on October 6, 2022”, the threatening message of October 6th 2022” and “Forenzic Agency report of December 27, 2022”

The accused Ademi and Rama, on November 7th, 2022, at the retrial hearing, had been declared innocent in connection with the charge being charged.

An attempt to start the retrial had been made on March 24, 2021, when a hearing was scheduled for the case, but that session had failed to be held due to a lack of indictees.

Because the criminal act of influence, which was also pronounced a refusal act in July 2019, has now been passed to the General Department of the Constitutional Court in Pristina.

This subject, originally when it was returned to the retrial, has been tried in the Department of Criminal Crimes by Judge Medie Bytyqi, the latter for the “Justice Vow” and had also confirmed that this subject has already passed the General Department.

Otherwise, the indictment against Rama and Adam was established on January 14, 2014, by the prosecutor EULEX, Maarten Groothuisen and Pristina Foundation Prosecutor's Prosecutor, Ilaz Beqiri.

According to the first point of the indictment, Ademi and Rama are charged that during the period of July 12th, September 12, 2012, with the aim of material gain, had threatened and attacked victim Dritro Kadolli, forcing the same to commit actions at the expense of his property, respectively, to make an unfair profit in the amount of 30,000 euros, or a car called “BUCH X5”

This vehicle, according to the prosecution, was then claimed to be handed over to Sami Hamit, former head of the Pristina Municipal Assembly, performing the criminal offence in co-ordination.

Meanwhile, at the second point of the indictment, Adam and Rama were accused of exercising influence in co-ordination.

According to the indictment, the two indictees had demanded from the injured Kadolli the promise of unjust profit -- the amount of 30,000 euros, or type car “, respectively. SINCE X5”, looking for the exercise of their improper influence in decision-making an official person who in this case was the former head of the Municipal Assembly in Pristina, Sami Hamiti, to change the status of a plot of land from the green-green” to the “construction area”.

The Constitutional Court in Pristina, on July 5, 2019, had convicted Ademi and Rama of the attempted criminal offence.

Ademi was sentenced by the first rate to nine months in effective prison, while Rama was sentenced to an effective year in prison.

In these sentences, the accused had been decided to be even counted as the time spent in detention from 12 September to 2 November 2012. For the criminal work of exercising influence, however, there had been a declaration of rejection because of the prescribing of this work.

By February 2020, the Court of Appeals had rejected the accused's complaints and had passed the sentences imposed by the first degree.

Disgusted with such judgments, however, the defenders of the accused had turned to him on request for protection of the Supreme Court's legality.

In terms of this requirement, the Supreme Court in July 2020 has decided to approve the same as based, and the subject has turned it into retrial to the first degree.

The Supreme Court's “Colegy, placing in terms of a demand for protection of the legality of M.R. convicted defender. Lawyer R.K., and convicted A.A., filed against the formal form of the Court in Pristina, the Department of Criminals, PKR.n.51/2014 of July 5, 2019, at the college session held on July 15, 2020, approved these two requests as based, while the Constitutional Court Act in Pristina quite frankly, PKR.n.51/2014 of July 5, 2019 and Kosovo Court of Appeals PARKR.r.504/2019 of February 12, 2020, cancelled the case, and returned the case to the first-instance court, to the retrial”, the Supreme Court's announcement said. /Betimibility. com