Ohrid Agreement, Consequencesity and Exequentity 7 interpretation of Serbs' self-awareness

The March 18th meeting in Ohrid ended with agreement between Kosovo and Serbia, but without its signing. However, the EU's US have said it should start implementing immediately, even though it has not been signed. Regarding the agreement or annex to implement the European plan, Arber Fetah of the Group [...] has spoken to Blic newspaper.
However, the EU's US have said it should start implementing immediately, even though it has not been signed.
Regarding agreement or annex to implement European plan, for Blic newspaper Arber Fetah from the Group for Jury and Political Studies (GLPS) has spoken.
He says it is characterized by doubles in language and substance and that there is no clarification as it should be in this, nor is there a precise timeline for each part.
The Ohrid Agreement or Annexi Agreement for implementation of the agreement is also marked by doubles in languages and substance. Instead of having greater clarity of the language and precise timetables for each point, this Anex has only determined deadlines, and there are no deadlines for implementation at other points. Anex leaves much to yearn for the above - mentioned reasons. However, it is important that Anex in some form makes implementation of the basic agreement overall and that creates a new circumstance of reports with Serbia binding. As a whole, I consider that the implementation plan had to be more precise, which would make its implementation predictable”, he points out.
As a benefit, according to Fetah, it can be to advance reports with Serbia to the level of recognition dealt facto, then recognition of state symbols, territorial integrity of states, license plates, diplomas, certificates and the fact that Serbia will not prevent Kosovo from membership in international organisations.
The benefits for Kosovo remain to be seen in the future. But the benefits are at the point where it says that provisions of the basic agreement become binding with this annex. In this case, the greatest benefit is advancing reports with Serbia at the level of recognition dealt facto based on the universal principles of international law and relations between states. As recognition of state symbols, territorial integrity of states, then recognition of license plates, diplomas, certificates, etc. And one of the most fundamental benefits is not representing each other in the international arena, and the pledge that Serbia does not prevent Kosovo for membership in international organisations”, he praised for the Blic newspaper.
While, regarding Article 7 of this plan, in terms of self-awareness of Serbs, he stresses that there is need for clarification and leaves room for interpretation, while adding that self-administration is less than self-government, but should be seen or implemented with this association of Serb majority municipalities.
There is still room in this case for interpretation in the word of CHAdhur, or just proper self-enamination of Serbs, even here we need precise clarification based on European models. I don't see anything new at this article compared to Ahtisaari's plan and past agreements, and reference to past agreements is the 2013 agreement that offers Kosovo Serbs a new instance of self-government. In the semantic language aspect self-management is less than self-government, but we have to see how it will be implemented on the ground and whether there will be a 100% reference to the 2013 Parations Agreement, where 6 points of this agreement speak of the establishment of the Community of the Serb Major Assembly”, stated Arber Fetah.
Otherwise, Prime Minister Albin Kurti will report to the Parliament on Thursday regarding the Ohrid meeting, until the opposition, which other than the AAK, has rejected the agreement reached.











