Obadiah: Kurti says he insists on confronting the past with Serbia, but in text he has agreed to exceed the legacy of the past

The Kosovo Assembly is discussing the agreement accepted by Kurti in Brussels, within dialogue with Serbia. LDK Chairman Lumir Abdixhiku has said Kurti speaks something else in the Assembly and something else is written on paper, Pryscopi notes. Obadiah has mentioned the legacy of the past to Kurti. [...]
LDK Chairman Lumir Abdixhiku has said Kurti speaks something else in the Assembly and something else is written on paper, Pryscopi notes.
Abdixhiku has mentioned to Kurti, agreeing to overcome the legacy of the past with Serbia, when it is known that Prime Minister Kurti was very vocal on the subject in the past.
“The prime minister says I insist on confronting the past with Serbia, but in text he has agreed to overcome the legacy of the past with Serbia. So what else you're talking about here in the speaker, but in the text it's about overcoming the past legacy with Serbia”.
“and did not mention the word “He said “Passing the past”, but not the word heritage. Legacy-in English that he accepted. And yet, in the German-German deal, you have nowhere to exceed the past. In the German-German deal you had to take to base, he said he'd decide not to overdo it. What you're talking about at the speaker and what you signed is two very opposite things. I don't understand. As I also understand the theme of raising the sides you are rightly required by two American presidents, Trump and Biden, for mutual recognition to be in its center. But why did you decide to end up with no prejudice on the status issue? Do they have days to tell me, Biden and Trump, “we seek final agreements without prejudice on status issues”. They've been saying this for days. But they requested mutual recognition at the centre. And you're done with the ignorance of status issues. As the first prime minister in the history of Kosovo, you have witnessed without prejudice in your status. Even Serbia, but yours. Why did we come here in two years, that's the point. And I have an interpretation”.
Because you have lost the opportunity in the question of dialogue and the good position Kosovo has had. Because you first talked about dialogue as the priority of 7-8, then you decided to show the sovereignty and integrity of the most Allied government that Kosovo, U.S.A. has had. And at this time Serbia has done everything to draw this ally closer. Therefore, the international position towards Kosovo has changed because you are late in two years of governance. Therefore, in mutual recognition you have passed into the unconvention of the parties on status issues. Now, this parallel is on the matter of revising preliminary agreements, but in the agreement you have reconciliation for all preliminary agreements”, Obadiah said. /Periscopi/











