Analyst: Pretty vague; The unsigned but binding agreement

According to them, even though the agreement has not been signed by the parties, under international laws, it is binding.

Political analyst Arbnor Sadiku said this annex does not clarify things in the sense of assuming responsibilities.

The “is in more subtle points than the deal is final. It's not very clear. It will be known whether it is applicable when the issue of (the last) the management of Serb municipalities comes, the statute for creating this kind of parallel institution of government. Then we will see how clear it will be”, he said.

He said the agreement, although not signed, the parties agree and the agreement becomes binding.

According to Sadik, there should be more pressure on the international side to implement this agreement.

The moment the parties in the dialogue say "yes" or "no" to the agreement, that agreement then through the processions goes through diplomatic channels and as such becomes binding. To apply this agreement as past agreements also implies that the parties must have will. And there's an international pressure guarantee to implement these agreements. We know that in the past, Serbia has signed, but in principle it has not implemented 90 percent of them”, he said.

Analyst Albinot Maloku has said that the annex is extremely unexplanatory, but the parties owe it to the Agreement.

Maloku also estimates that although the agreement has not been signed, according to international law when state leaders agree on something it becomes binding on the parties.

<x) But he stresses that the annex owes the parties to live up to the agreement on February 27th, and concerns the agreements reached until the day of agreement.

“The practice of the creative findings of the European Union is becoming obsolete at certain times, for the fact that continued testing on documents has been used by various names and modifications, and even this not establishing of signing is a kind of finding for calming or compromising the parties. President Vuciq, in front of his audience, is saying that I don't sign the signature, but on the other side according to international law, when the heads of state agree on something becomes binding on the parties and that this too is mandatory for Kosovo and Serbia”, he said.

The European Union, namely Borell, should immediately start implementing what is agreed on, including pre-signed agreements. In this practice it is not that it has ever been binding and must be applied”, he said.