Kurt is right when he says: It's not Zajednica. [Because it's much more]

It says: Dafina Demak

Calculations, events, individuals are some of the points that They went through the extraordinary Assembly session for the draft Association, Between them: “...no entry without signing. It's not Zajednica. Vuffy's looking for you”

Beyond this political cell phone, with a discurs overlap since the end of the day, the accounts in votes are some of the names that speak clearly in this blurry about the Agreement and Association.

One of them is called Jeffrey Hovenier and is ambassador of the United States of America to Kosovo. As for Signing Or not, he says so:

Agreement and Annex They are legally binding. The Council of Europe approved it in its conclusions. The EU announced that Serbia's EU membership protocols will include obligations. Less important for the way it was approved, to focus on obligations reached”, he said the day before in an exclusive interview for Channel 10, bring Periscope back to your attention. 

Agreement conditions for Euro-Atlantic integration?

Yeah. Progress's Final ReportIt clearly marks this point. Any statement of any strong European country (Germany, France, Italy) clearly mark this point, underscoring that the path of integration is already largely dependent on implementation of the Ohrid Agreement.

In order not to extend here, read higher than the U.S. ambassador's statement, but we're also bringing the interpretation of the former head of the Constitutional Court here, Mr. Enver Hasani, who in the newly published book ) constitutional right, writes this:

“The two countries will have it as a barometer for their European journey, the level of implementation of the Mo and the Implementation Plan (last point of the Implementation Plan specifically links EU accession to the level of implementation of MO obligations from parties)”Fuck.

“Piles remember that Agreement and Implementation Annex Become integral part of relevant membership processes Kosovo, Serbia in EU”, says Plan 3 point.

Where do Thaci's 2013 and Mustafa 2015 and Kurt's deal in Ohrid differ?

Ohrid Agreement, It's aSuper-unconstitutional obligation for the Serb community in Kosovo and what (Tighted!) to elabor Enver Hasani, it is one Base URI for Material Conditions for Serbs in Kosovo.

How much easier could you understand that?

The Republic of Kosovo has its own formal Constitution as any independent and sovereign state. Establishing a Mechanism )only, Specific Arageautonomy, Meaning State within the state.

“Ohrid Agreement cemented the foundations of one Material conditions in Kosovo, which will Exists parallel and in rivalry with Kosovo ConstitutionLike the formal Constitution of a sovereign and independent state”.Shit.

According to this interpretation Kosovo's state is being transformed based on this material constitution, into a unitary state with advanced decentralisation that has autonomy within it Tarthronous and Turritorial. They're guaranteed together The rivalry with central power in Pristina.Fuck.

With territorial autonomy, it's referring to the agreement that speaks with the language of self-advention and specific occupation, that's how it's simple: territorial autonomy. As Dukagjin Gorani says in Pressing FromNorth to Shtrpce Meanwhile, in terms of the chapter in the prof book, your own autonomy. Enver Hasani means In the right of cultural, religious heritage, etc.

This definition, which focuses on the concept of self-awareness in an additional provision at Article 7.2. connects with Serbian Orthodox Church and Cultural and Religious Heritage in Serbian countriesFuck you.

To implement the Ohrid Agreement, EU itself caresWho created one Common Committees ( article 10 of the Agreement concerning point 6 of the MO Implementation Plan).Shit.

Simpler example of autonomy as a result of the association rivalry with power in Pristina (Kosovo Republic)

While I was drinking coffee with a well-known Kosovo judicial expert, I asked him to explain to me, as Americans say, "forty dudes" the issue of the autonomy of association and thisThe rivalry of central power.

“Suppose that the president of Leposaviqi, or Zubin Potok, wants to create a bus line that crosses both countries. Under jurisdiction, currently, the proposal these mayors make would not contradict the Constitution because it is the request of two mayors, or three and four. The moment the mayor of Zajednica calls these two mayors and announces to them the decision on this bus line, as his exclusive request, this is the 3rd University of Power in Kosovo that the president of Association will be able to exercise”, This friend told me.

Beyond this simple embankment of power exercise, note the following example, how Enver Hasani provides Book:

Any support of Serbian power structures in Kosovo, with Kosovo state infrastructure, will be only Temporary and Transitary until Carrying institutional memory created after June 10th 1999 to Serbian bodies and institutions of autonomy created with the Ohrid Agreement (weighing personal documentation involving local Serbs)

)From this can be seen that the Kosovo state model, built on February 17, 2008, has followed radical changes., concludes the chapter of the book, which elaborizes constitutional right worldwide, but on page 720, it only speaks of the legal effect produced by all the agreements in dialogue, including the latter from the Kurti government and where parts of it have been cited in this article. /Periscopi/

(All quotes used in the article referred to this type of input *, fuck ) are part of the book: “Constitutional right, “6.1. Kosova”, page 720, author: Prof.dr. Enver Hasani, Prof. Ass.dr: Progress Gruda, Prof.as.dr: Zahir Cherkini)