Gorani: For 10 years, we've been told there's no Zajednica, they're telling us today that it's easier to do it.

)What we don't know, there's a lot of things we don't know, for example, is this part of the draft-state that I think is at least in public opinion no one has any clear on what it contains.

We know what the Ohrid Agreement or Annex contains, we still do not know how it has to be implemented.

Today we learned of a message, or Tutsi, by the Albanian prime minister, praising Kosovo's prime minister, praising him for accepting the plan that includes draft status.

The accession of association seems to be a prerequisite of implementing agreements involving the Ohrid Annex.

So association or Zajednica is the start of implementation.

I think that's why it's map draft status and it's up to the emergency level with other documents.

That's what Prime Minister Rama's Tutsi is.

This part of the Serbian government's emphatic letter, which on the part of our government is interpreted as sabotage of the process, should be seen in what way it is forgotten.

Without having a clear explanation on the part of the EU, it is difficult to make a statement that is, or refused, on the part of the Kosovo government.

This form of acceptance, which is designed by the government tonight, gives you an impression that this is some kind of admission considered unacceptable in the situation.

We need to make it clear to us the intercessors, what is the following?

If we read the text, we have accepted it completely, we have accepted the draft of the statute that we do not know what it contains, we have confirmed Ohrid, but this is not something new, that was said before.

The process of dialogue implies exclusively the establishment of association. From the beginning to the end, dialogue is meant for one thing: the accommodation of the Serb community, especially in the north, to integrate into the state of Kosovo.

So the accommodation of a geographical community, which from the Kumanovo Agreement, has not been entirely accurate.

Because of a military agreement.

And now, the return of the north under jurisdiction to the state of Kosovo has been the Mandunes to take place through a process of dialogue.

The issue of Serbia's recognition, membership in international organisations, these are considered secondary aspects.

Tonight we're talking about issues that have been considered secondary aspects, and tonight we're lying like priority aspects”, Said Gorani, Periscope escorts.

Gorani: If we're back at the 2013 Association, someone has to tell us how we lost 10 years.

What are these statements saying, is this: Is accepting association easier if it comes to seating in the UN?

Do you have access to association easier if it's about de facto recognition?

And for the past 10 years, we're facing another dilemma, and that's whether there should be Association, right?

Tonight we're talking about whether the association is easier if it's somewhere the perspective of seating in the UN, or whether a variant or a form of de facto recognition is highlighted.

This is intended for us to avoid a 10-year discussion: whether there will be association, what the Association will be. If there is an association, what this draft contains.

If it contains the 2015 version of rewritten, we're here asking the same question, why are we ten years late? And how does Kosovo's power and the middleman intend to bring us this news, that we are back in 2013 and 2015, and that the same thing happened.

Since it is possible that this statute has been so important to us, so vital to the functioning of the state even no one in the opinion would have access to it. Nobody, said Gorani in Pressing. /Periscopi/