The accused of violating 11-year-old will undergo psychiatric examination

Five people who are facing serious charges in the case of a 11-year-old rape will undergo psychiatric examination. For this, it is established by the Constitutional Court in Pristina, following the request of defence lawyers at the session held after returning to the retrial of this case by Apel. However, the subject, still [...]
Five people who are facing serious charges in the case of a 11-year-old rape will undergo psychiatric examination.
For this, it is established by the Constitutional Court in Pristina, following the request of defence lawyers at the session held after returning to the retrial of this case by Apel.
However, the subject for this case has not yet arrived at the Forenzie Psychiatry Institute, the institution that continues to face large numbers of such requirements.
According to attorney Anton Noecaj, in many cases these are meant to reduce the conviction of the accused.
If it is found to have mental problems, then it can be taken as a circumstance that has done it under the influence of what it did not control itself, but that I must say because in almost all criminal processes, the person who has committed the dead crime, violation or other acts, always the protective side exploits this legal tool, under the prefix to be surrounded by the gendarmias<1>, has emphasized Anton Noecaj CLARD.
During February, four of the five accused were sentenced to 40 years in prison, while one had been acquitted of charges in absence of evidence.
Ekrem Rexhepi was sentenced to 15 years in prison until three minors, G.R. to 9 years in prison, while G.J. and J.S. were sentenced to eight years in prison each.
The first degree bias was involved in multiple violations, which has prompted the second degree to annul the fundamental decision and turn it into restoration.
According to the Court of Appeals, which Dukagjini owns, the fundamental act was involved in substantial violations of criminal procedure provisions and is unclear.
“The complaint is unclear, the court has not stated clearly and fully what facts it has considered confirmed or not, it has not assessed the accuracy of countersult evidence, in court no grounds have been given on which it is based on the case of setting up this criminal case, and there is a contradiction of the crucial facts between what is presented in the case of the conviction filed with the contents of the documents and proceedings given in criminal procedure, specifically with the case of the prosecution of criminal acts and the criminal responsibility of the minors, as well as the case of the enforcement of the cases of the criminal law and the execution of the criminal acts, the Aplate of the Court, the Aplate of the Court, and the Ax, the Ax, the Ajust.
Of the 11-year-old violation that was made public in August last year, 13 persons are being charged in two separate processes until acts for which they are charged are “The sex services of trafficking victim”, “Trafficking with people”, “ / RTV Dukagini












