6 minutes agoLawyer Berisha: Prosecutor today “nailed” by arguments, Arben Citaku was arrested with false evidence
Periskopi(4 years ago)
(4 years ago)Besnik Berisha, the lawyer of the former secretary at the Ministry of Environment, Arben Citaku, has reacted to a Community of Ferizaj's Prosecutor, in which Chitak's questioning has reportedly been interrupted, as Berisha's lawyer was responding instead, despite his being prompted. Berisha through a post [...]
Berisha has said via a Facebook post that the prosecution is trying that via a media communiqué “ta covers her shame”, without asking anyone, writes news.net.
This is because according to Berisha, the prosecutor today is “-ex1> with evidence and arguments, that he has failed to proceed further to interview Chitak, who according to Berisha has been illegally deprived of freedom, writes the news.net.
“Today it was revealed to him that Mr. Citaku is made based on forged evidence, incorrect testimony and lack of knowledge of his law and legal acts covering the scope of former MMPH secretary”, said Berisha's post.
On the other hand, the latter has said the prosecutor has seriously violated the law and code of ethics, as he tried to deny the right to Arben Citak for effective access to defence.
Of course, the fear he could face with the law is the only reason why the Prosecutor leaves communiquette in this case, this action that never happens before”, Berisha wrote.
Lawyer Besnik Berisha's full post:
Come on “State”
Why?!
My client and I have answers to this and she's quite simple: The prosecutor today ran into evidence and arguments that he couldn't afford further proceedings of the interview because he confirmed that he had been deprived of illegal freedom. Arben Citaku.
Today it was revealed to him that Mr. Citaku is made based on forged evidence, incorrect testimony and lack of knowledge of his law and legal acts that cover the scope of former MMPH secretary.
Today, instead of apologizing for the ignorance and damage caused by Mr. Citak, the prosecutor continued his attempt to deny Mr. Citaku for effective access to defence and follow-up, severely violated the law and code of ethics for the prosecutor.
Of course, the fear he might face with the law is the only reason why the Prosecutor leaves communicates in this case, this action that has never happened before.
If the prosecution had guilty evidence, not only would it not impress him what the defendant or his lawyer claims, but he would proceed without delay with his interview.
Don't leave communiqués but observe the law! We don't blackmail.
